Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

DMC is One of the Best RB Recievers in the Game

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Baggabonez


Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3855
Location: RaiderNation
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:17 am    Post subject: DMC is One of the Best RB Recievers in the Game Reply with quote

ProFootballFocus wrote:
Yards Per Route Run–The Best

The oft-injured Darren McFadden tops the list of backs here, just barely edging out the Saints’ prolific duo, which might come as a surprise. Also in the Top 10 are Arian Foster, Matt Forte and Rice, showing that they aren’t just in for pass plays to make the defense think they might run, but because they are very effective as receivers. Also in the Top 10 is a reunion of the 2010 San Diego backfield, as Sproles was once a Charger, Ryan Mathews on his small sample finished fifth, and Mike Tolbert rounded out the top group.


DMC is going to go off in a WCO with both feet and hands. In a bit of irony Benson graded out as one of the worst receiving RBs in the league. He's not right for the Raiders or a WCO. I'd rather have Ed Wesley and I wouldn't be surprised to see him brought in.

ProFootballFocus wrote:
Yards Per Route Run–The Bottom

The bottom of the chart is full of interesting names as well. Cedric Benson has not been the answer in Cincinnati’s passing game and he was replaced by BenJarvus Green-Ellis, who hasn’t fared much better. Bengals offensive coordinator Jay Gruden prizes receiving backs for his West Coast offense, so one has to wonder if they really added anything. The Chiefs also decided to make a change by replacing the second-least-effective back in Thomas Jones, but they had a major upgrade with one of the best receiving backs in 2010, Peyton Hillis. In 2011, the Cardinals traded away Tim Hightower who hasn’t fared well in this metric, but still have Beanie Wells in the Bottom 10.Read the rest of the article here . . .

_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big_palooka


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 19228
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DMAC is an all around impressive football player. He has better hands than a lot of WRs in the game.

If he stays healthy, there is no limit to what he can be in Oakland. I feel robbed when he's not playing. When he's on, I feel like a teenager giddy watching him touch the ball.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7380
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is known. I just hope his feet become some of the healthiest in the game. We need him to be a formidable opponent this season IMO.
_________________

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Quote:

you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs?

not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darbsk


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 634
Location: Wales, UK
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm desperate for DMac to stay healthy this year, dispell the doubters (though they are justified with regard to his injury history) and be the player Al Davis knew he could be. Not only is he a very talented football player he works his butt off too and it's these types of players we should all be rooting for......

With regard to the WCO that should allow him to excel and really show his skill set so it's all the more important we pray to the god of metatarsels or turf toes or whatever that he stays 100% fit. Only reservation i have is the zone blocking scheme of the OL, maybe it was due to his injury troubles but he struggled with it first time round.
_________________
“It may take us a short while, but we'll get that nastiness of the Raiders back.”
Mr. Al Davis RIP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZoomWaffle


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 4600
Location: AZ
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

big_palooka wrote:
DMAC is an all around impressive football player. He has better hands than a lot of WRs in the game.

If he stays healthy, there is no limit to what he can be in Oakland. I feel robbed when he's not playing. When he's on, I feel like a teenager giddy watching him touch the ball.


With him and Reece in the backfield, we have a very dangerous duo that can run, catch, and even pass (DMC). Im hoping Knapp can use this to our advantage- we should be able to cause fits for opposing defenses with two receiving backs with their size and speed back there.
_________________


Silver&Black88 on the sig

La_Vader wrote:
I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12638
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

big_palooka wrote:
DMAC is an all around impressive football player. He has better hands than a lot of WRs in the game.

If he stays healthy, there is no limit to what he can be in Oakland. I feel robbed when he's not playing. When he's on, I feel like a teenager giddy watching him touch the ball.


agree. when he is healthy watching him play reminds me of bo jackson on tecmo bowl.
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group