| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
GaTechRavens
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 15585
Location: Knoxville, TN
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 6:57 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Wouldn't the most dangerous team be the best team?
_________________
| ArrowheadRage58 wrote: | | I'd much rather be in our position now than the Ravens, that's for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John232
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 9731
Location: A place where everybody is from somewhere else.
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Seattle is the only team that Really worries me. I think Arizona can do some damage too, but I don't think they're a playoff team yet. They are close though.
Seattle mirrors SF in many ways and that's what scares me.
_________________
xsaMainevent on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9161
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Chargers
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Texansfan713
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 23424
Location: Houston
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ttitansfan4life wrote: | | Easily the Texans. I'm not scared of the Jags or Colts. |
Vise versa. Titans for me. If Locker wins the job and he is the real deal, they can be scary. I hate going against mobile QB's that can throw the ball too.
_________________
2011 and 2012 AFC South Champs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Biggsam49
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 291
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I suppose after losing twice to them last year and then them adding a mobile QB(which we sometimes struggle with) the Giants should be most afraid of Washington. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 5602
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Biggsam49 wrote: | | I suppose after losing twice to them last year and then them adding a mobile QB(which we sometimes struggle with) the Giants should be most afraid of Washington. |
Dont be ridiculous. That was an abberation.
The eagles are our biggest threat.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Texans. Good rush attack, good air attack when they have to throw, and a very good defense.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
norcalraider510
Joined: 12 Feb 2011
Posts: 6376
Location: The Itty Bitty City By The Water
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
san diego "scares" me the most out of the 3. We can easily sweep KC/Denver
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zacapr22
Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 897
Location: East
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Steelers scare me, I'm really scared of getting blown out again. The Ravens don't scare me one bit though.
_________________
Shout out to Tim Tebow, Mark Sanchez, and Carson Palmer for making our playoff hopes a reality |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MonserinNC
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 4964
Location: Back in the CHIIII
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I guess I would say Lions, Bears and Pack are a rivalry and the games are always good.
If the Lions really step it up and push us down to a third place type team, that would be rough.
_________________
| BrotherlyLove wrote: | | Cutler isn't sexy enough to be compared to sexy rexy, let's get real |
| Darrelle Revis wrote: | | TEBOWSANITYMANIA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mistakebytehlak
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 38712
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | | Wouldn't the most dangerous team be the best team? |
not necesarily, an up and down team that has really high highs and really low lows and varies from week to weak could be most dangerous cause they can strike at any given point, but they end up going 8-8.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fired-Up
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 788
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Honestly being a fan of the Packers I'm going to say the Giants. For one they have proven that they can't beat us fair and square. We have the best QB in the league so to beat the Packers you must be on a seek and destroy mission where Rodgers is the target. They can do that. Their front 4 is amazing. They get pressure with 4 and drop 7 and they can be tough.
I'm not scared of the Lions, Cowboys, Patriots, Saints or any high powered offense. Anybody who tries to go toe to toe with us is just going to get blown off the field with the efficiency of the pass game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 5602
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Fired-Up wrote: | Honestly being a fan of the Packers I'm going to say the Giants. For one they have proven that they can't beat us fair and square. We have the best QB in the league so to beat the Packers you must be on a seek and destroy mission where Rodgers is the target. They can do that. Their front 4 is amazing. They get pressure with 4 and drop 7 and they can be tough.
I'm not scared of the Lions, Cowboys, Patriots, Saints or any high powered offense. Anybody who tries to go toe to toe with us is just going to get blown off the field with the efficiency of the pass game. |
we cant beat you fair and square? Is that a typo?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fired-Up
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 788
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| reckless123 wrote: | | Fired-Up wrote: | Honestly being a fan of the Packers I'm going to say the Giants. For one they have proven that they can't beat us fair and square. We have the best QB in the league so to beat the Packers you must be on a seek and destroy mission where Rodgers is the target. They can do that. Their front 4 is amazing. They get pressure with 4 and drop 7 and they can be tough.
I'm not scared of the Lions, Cowboys, Patriots, Saints or any high powered offense. Anybody who tries to go toe to toe with us is just going to get blown off the field with the efficiency of the pass game. |
we cant beat you fair and square? Is that a typo? |
Woops. That was a typo. I meant to say they beat us fair and square. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 5602
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Fired-Up wrote: | | reckless123 wrote: | | Fired-Up wrote: | Honestly being a fan of the Packers I'm going to say the Giants. For one they have proven that they can't beat us fair and square. We have the best QB in the league so to beat the Packers you must be on a seek and destroy mission where Rodgers is the target. They can do that. Their front 4 is amazing. They get pressure with 4 and drop 7 and they can be tough.
I'm not scared of the Lions, Cowboys, Patriots, Saints or any high powered offense. Anybody who tries to go toe to toe with us is just going to get blown off the field with the efficiency of the pass game. |
we cant beat you fair and square? Is that a typo? |
Woops. That was a typo. I meant to say they beat us fair and square. |
Oh that makes sense.
In both games last year, aaron rodgers was driving us mad. Our front 4 got pressure on aaron rodgers plenty of times especially on third down, he would tuck and run for the 1st down, which was so annoying. The game in the regular season when you beat us 38-35, aaron rodgers was the game's leading rusher.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
