Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Who should start at QB in Seattle?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 15, 16, 17  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who should start at QB for the Seahawks?
Matt Flynn
70%
 70%  [ 155 ]
Tarvaris Jackson
7%
 7%  [ 16 ]
Russell Wilson
22%
 22%  [ 50 ]
Total Votes : 221

Author Message
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Willink wrote:
Matt Flynn easily.

Wilson may have better physical tools, but Flynn's are good enough to win with, and his mental side of the game is much stronger.


T-Jax sucks and should get cut to stop stealing Flynn's reps.


How do you figure his mental game is much stronger? Wilson is younger and has more football starts in his life than Flynn. Flynn had 1 starting year in college and 2 starts in the NFL
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fired-Up


Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 788
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 10977
Location: .flash on the avy
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seahawks206 wrote:
Canadian_Patriot wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Hammertime52 wrote:
Matt Flynn easy.


why do you say that? Wilson has more upside


So why did they spent a serious chunk of cash on Flynn?


He has 10 million guranteed which is not starter money. Nice try tho haha. If they truly thought 100% that Flynn was the guy, why did they select Wilson so early in the draft? They couldve got Flynn a receiver
Logic fail on your part. The Packers spent a 2nd round pick and a 7th round pick the year Rodgers took over even though he was the NO DOUBT starter. The Redskins spend a 4th rounder on Cousins even though they gave up a kings ransom for RGIII. Teams draft based on value, not needs. At least good teams do.

As for the question, Jackson should not be starting on a team with guys like Flynn and Wilson. Wilson is a wildcard but i've watched Flynn every year in the NFL and would be shocked if he isn't starting.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fired-Up wrote:
Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?


You're argument is not very strong. Flynn has been on the bench for years haha. He is essentially still a young QB
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bohlmann20


Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 5138
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I knew who started this thread before looking at the username.


Matt Flynn is definitely the answer for now.

Wilson could be a top 20 QB (which honestly is setting the bar low for him) if he learns how to pass consistently without the aid of play-action/roll out passes.

TJack should be released before he screw things up even more for Seattle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fired-Up


Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 788
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?


You're argument is not very strong. Flynn has been on the bench for years haha. He is essentially still a young QB


Flynn was doing what many QB's do. They ride the bench and learn. Do you realize that your statement supports my arguement. Flynn riding the bench was good for his development. Wilson is Just Another Guy. A guy that nobody really wanted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Canadian_Patriot wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Hammertime52 wrote:
Matt Flynn easy.


why do you say that? Wilson has more upside


So why did they spent a serious chunk of cash on Flynn?


He has 10 million guranteed which is not starter money. Nice try tho haha. If they truly thought 100% that Flynn was the guy, why did they select Wilson so early in the draft? They couldve got Flynn a receiver
Logic fail on your part. The Packers spent a 2nd round pick and a 7th round pick the year Rodgers took over even though he was the NO DOUBT starter. The Redskins spend a 4th rounder on Cousins even though they gave up a kings ransom for RGIII. Teams draft based on value, not needs. At least good teams do.

As for the question, Jackson should not be starting on a team with guys like Flynn and Wilson. Wilson is a wildcard but i've watched Flynn every year in the NFL and would be shocked if he isn't starting.


Not true at all. One of my friends' dad is Will Lewis,President of the Seahawks. He told me that the Seahawks said that if they didnt get Wilson the draft would be a failure. They planned on taking Wilson in the 3rd. It wasnt "oh we're gonna select the best player available"
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 10977
Location: .flash on the avy
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?


You're argument is not very strong. Flynn has been on the bench for years haha. He is essentially still a young QB
So a guy that has been in NFL training camps and NFL practices and has shined in his only 2 starts in the NFL while breaking single game records his 2nd start is less prepared then a rookie that has never even seen an NFL game yet? Get out of here with that garbage. I love Wilsons and long term, could be the Seahawks guy but this year, you give the keys to Flynn and roll with it because he's ready for the spot light. He's spent 4 seasons on an NFL team preparing to be the guy and has shown he's ready in his first 2 career starts.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fired-Up wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?


You're argument is not very strong. Flynn has been on the bench for years haha. He is essentially still a young QB


Flynn was doing what many QB's do. They ride the bench and learn. Do you realize that your statement supports my arguement. Flynn riding the bench was good for his development. Wilson is Just Another Guy. A guy that nobody really wanted.


So are you saying that Wilson doesnt have 1st round talent? haha because i'm no expert but all Tannehill has over Wilson is height. And not all QBs ride the bench and become a starter. Thats what early round QBs used to do. Just because late round picks like Hasselbeck and Brady developed into all pros, doesnt mean that is the norm
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?


You're argument is not very strong. Flynn has been on the bench for years haha. He is essentially still a young QB
So a guy that has been in NFL training camps and NFL practices and has shined in his only 2 starts in the NFL while breaking single game records his 2nd start is less prepared then a rookie that has never even seen an NFL game yet? Get out of here with that garbage. I love Wilsons and long term, could be the Seahawks guy but this year, you give the keys to Flynn and roll with it because he's ready for the spot light. He's spent 4 seasons on an NFL team preparing to be the guy and has shown he's ready in his first 2 career starts.


Did i say his 2 starts were equal to a rookie? or did I say he is essentially a young qb? haha you have to remember he isnt on green bay anymore. he is on a new team learning a new offense with 2 starts under his belt. that is a young qb
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bohlmann20 wrote:

Wilson could be a top 20 QB (which honestly is setting the bar low for him) if he learns how to pass consistently without the aid of play-action/roll out passes.

TJack should be released before he screw things up even more for Seattle.


If you have ever watched the Seahawks you would know that their offense is full of play action passes and plays where a mobile QB can run if needed haha. Maybe you wouldnt of noticed the plays that played to a mobile qb's strength only cuz tjax is awful and held the ball too long LMAO
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fired-Up


Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 788
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Matt Flynn and it's not even close. People over estimate physical tools. Playing QB ain't about being Jamarcus Russell, it's about being Tom Brady. Wilson will look like a fish out of water when the 49ers defense is all over him. Flynn has been an NFL QB for years. He knows what it takes. He has so much more experience. And it's not like Wilson is very talented in his own right. He was a 3rd round QB for a reason. I can't believe people are saying he even has a good physical skill set. He is 5-11. Are you kidding? 5-11?


You're argument is not very strong. Flynn has been on the bench for years haha. He is essentially still a young QB


Flynn was doing what many QB's do. They ride the bench and learn. Do you realize that your statement supports my arguement. Flynn riding the bench was good for his development. Wilson is Just Another Guy. A guy that nobody really wanted.


So are you saying that Wilson doesnt have 1st round talent? haha because i'm no expert but all Tannehill has over Wilson is height. And not all QBs ride the bench and become a starter. Thats what early round QBs used to do. Just because late round picks like Hasselbeck and Brady developed into all pros, doesnt mean that is the norm


No Wilson does not have 1st round talent. My reasoning is that he's just not good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bohlmann20


Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 5138
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seahawks206 wrote:
Bohlmann20 wrote:

Wilson could be a top 20 QB (which honestly is setting the bar low for him) if he learns how to pass consistently without the aid of play-action/roll out passes.

TJack should be released before he screw things up even more for Seattle.


If you have ever watched the Seahawks you would know that their offense is full of play action passes and plays where a mobile QB can run if needed haha. LMAO


Doesn't matter. Wilson hasn't proven he can make plays consistently without the aid of play action. Even if the Seahawks' offense uses a lot of play action, Wilson will still need to improve on his all around game (shotgun, under center w/o play action) before he can be a good starting QB.

He's just not ready.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelerspower


Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 6522
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll be shocked if it's not Flynn

Wilson is a rookie(3rd round)and Jackson is awful
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
forty six & 2


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 3841
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seattle should start Flynn and see what he has. They invested a good amount of money in him and they should see if he is able to be the present and the future at the position. Starting Wilson doesn't seem very logical, he's a rookie with plenty of time to show what he has down the line if Flynn falters. The obvious exception here is if Wilson vastly outplays Flynn during camp and in the preseason.
_________________
Seahawks206 wrote:
The Seahawks will win 10 games this year. Write it down
Fired-Up wrote:
Rodgers will settle into a 35 TD, 7 INT, 112 QB rating player.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Page 2 of 17

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group