| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Django 
Joined: 03 May 2012 Posts: 1482
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I am in AWE of Andrew Luck.
As I've said before
Luck > RG3/Cam |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 24492 Location: Sam Bradfords Bed!
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Weeden is better than all of them. _________________
| Dus10 wrote: | | Note to self: Do not lose a sig bet to Rammy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Django 
Joined: 03 May 2012 Posts: 1482
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Luck MAKES the game winning TD.
Cam WOEFULLY MISSES the game winning TD.
I am just in awe of Cam's inability to be clutch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dcreek 
Joined: 09 Nov 2010 Posts: 202 Location: Parts Unknown
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Cam Newton just looks bad. No other way to put it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iknowcool 
Joined: 15 Apr 2009 Posts: 11403
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BBIB
Joined: 20 Jan 2008 Posts: 7414
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Django 
Joined: 03 May 2012 Posts: 1482
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
All mobile QBs have been exposed. Vick has been exposed. Cam. And RG3 will too if he cant protect himself from hits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iknowcool 
Joined: 15 Apr 2009 Posts: 11403
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Django wrote: | | BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
All mobile QBs have been exposed. Vick has been exposed. Cam. And RG3 will too if he cant protect himself from hits. |
I guess that is why Nolan couldn't stop Cam last week and RG3 is one of the highest rated passers in the NFL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Django 
Joined: 03 May 2012 Posts: 1482
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iknowcool wrote: | | Django wrote: | | BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
All mobile QBs have been exposed. Vick has been exposed. Cam. And RG3 will too if he cant protect himself from hits. |
I guess that is why Nolan couldn't stop Cam last week and RG3 is one of the highest rated passers in the NFL. |
Im talking about WINNING GAMES.
This fluky offense isnt a productive way to win football games. It puts up numbers, but it doesnt translate to wins.
Christian Ponder, Andy Dalton. QBs in TRADITIONAL offenses. Are outperforming Cam. Why? Cause they are doing what it takes to succeed in the NFL. Cam is still playing college ball. Redskins better cool it with RG3 if he wants his career to last. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J Pep 4 Step 
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 25261 Location: Greenvillain, NC
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Django wrote: | | BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
All mobile QBs have been exposed. Vick has been exposed. Cam. And RG3 will too if he cant protect himself from hits. |
You wouldnt describe Luck as a mobile QB? _________________
| jrry32 wrote: | | Faulk's argument style is reminiscent of Mark Sanchez's passing style. Inconsistent as hell and all over the place. I'm just waiting for him to run into iPwn's butt and fumble. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J Pep 4 Step 
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 25261 Location: Greenvillain, NC
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Django wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Django wrote: | | BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
All mobile QBs have been exposed. Vick has been exposed. Cam. And RG3 will too if he cant protect himself from hits. |
I guess that is why Nolan couldn't stop Cam last week and RG3 is one of the highest rated passers in the NFL. |
Im talking about WINNING GAMES.
This fluky offense isnt a productive way to win football games. It puts up numbers, but it doesnt translate to wins.
Christian Ponder, Andy Dalton. QBs in TRADITIONAL offenses. Are outperforming Cam. Why? Cause they are doing what it takes to succeed in the NFL. Cam is still playing college ball. Redskins better cool it with RG3 if he wants his career to last. |
What is "fluky" or non traditional about our offense? _________________
| jrry32 wrote: | | Faulk's argument style is reminiscent of Mark Sanchez's passing style. Inconsistent as hell and all over the place. I'm just waiting for him to run into iPwn's butt and fumble. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iknowcool 
Joined: 15 Apr 2009 Posts: 11403
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So, it really seems to me you are blaming our lack of success more on our offensive coordinator than you are Newton.
Either way, are you implying our offense last year would have somehow not generate as much, or more, wins had they had the Bengals defense? Because Newton out performed Dalton in every way.
And Redskins are what, 3-2, 2-3? I think it is safe to say their offense certainly isn't holding them because considering they've been competitive in every game this year.
Last edited by iknowcool on Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J Pep 4 Step 
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 25261 Location: Greenvillain, NC
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
I like how he started out trying to give the impression that he was impartial in all this. _________________
| jrry32 wrote: | | Faulk's argument style is reminiscent of Mark Sanchez's passing style. Inconsistent as hell and all over the place. I'm just waiting for him to run into iPwn's butt and fumble. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silver&Black88 
Joined: 24 Feb 2009 Posts: 24644 Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| J Pep 4 Step wrote: | | Django wrote: | | BBIB wrote: | | iknowcool wrote: | | Yes, we know. Cam sucks. He's worse than every QB in the entire league and Luck through 5 games is already a better QB than he or Griffin will ever be (despite having much worse numbers than either of those two QBs coming into this week). |
LOL you see why he posts it like 6 times because he's trying to convince himself
The funny thing is they set up a win win situation. First they say RGIII for instance will do better than Luck as a rookie. So they lowered the bar. So if RGIII had a better season it wouldn't mean anything. But if he doesn't or if he doesn't even have a better game, that's PROOF that Luck >>>>> RGIII |
All mobile QBs have been exposed. Vick has been exposed. Cam. And RG3 will too if he cant protect himself from hits. |
You wouldnt describe Luck as a mobile QB? |
Not even that, but Cam is different than those guys. It's apples and oranges. Vick and Griffin are built much, much differently than Newton. If I were to compare Cam to any running QB, it might be Tebow. But he's already a lot better than him. Cam has the size and build that Vick and RG3 don't. That argument was plain dumb.
And not only that, but let's say that hypothetically he is comparable to RGIII and Vick in that way. We'll go into the the next comment; 'winning games'. Did Vick not win a lot of games in Atlanta and even 2 years ago in Philly? He can't help Reid calling less and less runs or when the defense lets him down. Nor could he help the lack of talented WR's in Atlanta.
And how is it proven that Griffin doesn't win games? Gtfoh with that. He owned New Orleans and marched down the field to win against TB. And even in the games he's lost, he's had solid numbers. Especially for a rookie. How one can even come to a conclusion that he does or doesn't win games at this point is mind blowing.
Oh, and Luck's record is 2-2. Does that mean he doesn't win games? Jeez. And I like Luck more than both Cam or RG3. But that argument was garbage. _________________
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | What do you season your meatballs and sausage with? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wackywabbit 
Joined: 20 Dec 2009 Posts: 3851
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I'd take Luck over any QB drafted in the last 5+ years. I thought that before he was drafted, and never stopped thinking that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|