Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Who is a bigger loss Jason Peters or Terrell Suggs?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Comparisons
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Bigger loss?
Terrell Suggs
56%
 56%  [ 25 ]
Jason Peters
43%
 43%  [ 19 ]
Total Votes : 44

Author Message
eaglesfan10


Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Posts: 10009
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:36 pm    Post subject: Who is a bigger loss Jason Peters or Terrell Suggs? Reply with quote

I understand they both play different positions, but who do you think is the bigger loss to their respective teams?

Sugg's replacements are a rotation of Paul Kruger, Albert McClellan, and Courtney Upshaw.

Peter's replacements are a rotation of King Dunlap and Demetress Bell.
_________________
Phire wrote:
Cooper will fight every Raider there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JaguarCrazy2832


Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 82969
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Peters is more important. Without Peters the Eagles OL is pretty much bad. Suggs off the ravens D is still a good defense
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reckless123


Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 11494
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:
I think Peters is more important. Without Peters the Eagles OL is pretty much bad. Suggs off the ravens D is still a good defense


the ravens D has played mediocre this year, they arent the same without T-sizzle. Also that Eagles O-line wasnt really good to begin with and hes not protecting mike vick's blindside.

so i would say T-sizzle.
_________________


"I'm not in the danger, I AM the DANGER" - Heisenberg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RainbowCarebear


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 34603
Location: "Are you hungry, child?" Yes, she thought, but not for food.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pass Rush > Proctection. Atleast you can help with TE/RB's, but if you have to blitz all day to get pressure you can be in problems.
_________________

"Do you imagine Whoresbane loves you any better? If you did not hold the ..., he would pull out your entrails and make you eat them"
"In return, we swore that we should always be their men"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneBadCat


Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 726
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jason Peters without a doubt. Michael Vick gets blasted every week. LT is one of the most important positions in football.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JammerHammer21


Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 24627
Location: Anywhere
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OneBadCat wrote:
Jason Peters without a doubt. Michael Vick gets blasted every week. LT is one of the most important positions in football.


It isn't Vick's blindside. Not saying that makes him unimportant, but still.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reckless123


Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 11494
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OneBadCat wrote:
Jason Peters without a doubt. Michael Vick gets blasted every week. LT is one of the most important positions in football.


You do know that michael vick's left side isnt his blindside. In general youre right regarding the importance of the LT but its not applicable to vick.
_________________


"I'm not in the danger, I AM the DANGER" - Heisenberg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneBadCat


Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 726
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peter's was still the best LT in the game in his prime. He would have made an absolute difference. The Raven's are still a formidable defense. Plus they have the "it's the Ravens defense " factor. Similar to the Steelers, it's a next man up mentality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WhackyPlague


Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 5028
Location: Orlando, FL
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peters, because his replacements are worse. Turned a pretty good OL into a pretty bad one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
green24


Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47490
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Suggs is a much better player, but the Ravens can replace him easier than the Eagles can replace Peters.
_________________


#TeamManfred
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 13799
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

green24 wrote:
Suggs is a much better player, but the Ravens can replace him easier than the Eagles can replace Peters.
They can? Because the games iv'e seen so far this year from the Ravens they have put a mediocre at best pass rush on the field.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Meco


Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 2565
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone voting Suggs clearly hasn't seen the state of the Eagles offensive line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kmvoss


Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2223
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I couldn't vote Suggs. I have felt bad for Vick the entire season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Estonianzulu


Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 25447
Location: Middle of Nowhere VA
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
green24 wrote:
Suggs is a much better player, but the Ravens can replace him easier than the Eagles can replace Peters.
They can? Because the games iv'e seen so far this year from the Ravens they have put a mediocre at best pass rush on the field.


I think that at this point the Eagles would be happy with mediocre OL play
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flaccomania


Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 21857
Location: Parkville, MD
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's tough to say whether the drop off in our defense is due to Terrell or the new system, but either way, our defense has looked pretty meh so far this year, particularly our pass offense. A lot of that has to do with the lack of a pass rush, but it also has to do with our press corners playing off coverage. So, it's tough to say.

I went Peters for the sake of this poll.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Comparisons All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group