View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
M-High Marauder 
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 2379 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:47 pm Post subject: Who Else Could Go? |
|
|
|
Another thing to think about is the staff that McCoy would build. If he gets a HC job, who else on the Broncos staff could we lose to promotions?
Let's say he leaves, and the Broncos pick Studesville or Gase as his replacement. We could lose the other one to McCoy. Or if the Broncos go outside to fill the position, one of the two could go with McCoy.
Also, who could go if JDR goes? _________________
Denver Broncos - Detroit Tigers - Michigan Wolverines |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JRebar913 
Joined: 11 Mar 2012 Posts: 989 Location: Kansas City
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
del rio isnt leaving. can we stop bringing that up now? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Winder23
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 4291
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think McCoy has enough class not to go after the Broncos coaching staff. At least that is the impression I get. _________________ GO BRONCOS! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JerseysFinest27 
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 8861 Location: New Jersey... Props to Joe_Is_The_Best on the sig
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKRNA
Joined: 28 May 2008 Posts: 6952
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
JerseysFinest27 wrote: | McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. |
I think, as many have mentioned, that Gase would have the inside track at OC if McCoy left. That said, I doubt he'd leave a promotion in this franchise to follow McCoy to a failing one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JerseysFinest27 
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 8861 Location: New Jersey... Props to Joe_Is_The_Best on the sig
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. |
I think, as many have mentioned, that Gase would have the inside track at OC if McCoy left. That said, I doubt he'd leave a promotion in this franchise to follow McCoy to a failing one. |
I would seriously doubt that Gase would get offered the OC job, just my opinion though. I believe Fox/Manning would go for someone outside then hiring from within. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKRNA
Joined: 28 May 2008 Posts: 6952
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
JerseysFinest27 wrote: | AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. |
I think, as many have mentioned, that Gase would have the inside track at OC if McCoy left. That said, I doubt he'd leave a promotion in this franchise to follow McCoy to a failing one. |
I would seriously doubt that Gase would get offered the OC job, just my opinion though. I believe Fox/Manning would go for someone outside then hiring from within. |
I understand both lines of reasoning, hiring from within or without, and both have benefits. Personally I prefer "from within".
I like the continuity that would bring, both with our offense and with BO's development. I think it would benefit Brock immensely to work with the same people and same philosophy for the 1st few years of his career. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JerseysFinest27 
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 8861 Location: New Jersey... Props to Joe_Is_The_Best on the sig
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. |
I think, as many have mentioned, that Gase would have the inside track at OC if McCoy left. That said, I doubt he'd leave a promotion in this franchise to follow McCoy to a failing one. |
I would seriously doubt that Gase would get offered the OC job, just my opinion though. I believe Fox/Manning would go for someone outside then hiring from within. |
I understand both lines of reasoning, hiring from within or without, and both have benefits. Personally I prefer "from within".
I like the continuity that would bring, both with our offense and with BO's development. I think it would benefit Brock immensely to work with the same people and same philosophy for the 1st few years of his career. |
I just dont think Gase is "ready" to be an OC. What has he done to warrant a promotion? Hes gone from WR coach to QB coach and then 2 years later he automatically deserves to be OC if McCoy leaves? Nah. Not me.
I also dont get the "BO development"? Since when does BO count for anything? Its Manning at the helm and in order to replace a strong leader in McCoy, you have to do that with another strong leader. Why cant they just leave Gase at QB coach? Isnt that better for BO's development?
Ive never heard from Fox's mouth, "Adam Gase has done a really good job with Peyton and Brock". He has said, "Mike and Peyton are working very well together". Thats key to me. Get someone to work well with Peyton. A 30-year-old WR/QB coach isnt that IMHO. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
broncos67
Joined: 28 Dec 2006 Posts: 24151 Location: PA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
JerseysFinest27 wrote: | AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. |
I think, as many have mentioned, that Gase would have the inside track at OC if McCoy left. That said, I doubt he'd leave a promotion in this franchise to follow McCoy to a failing one. |
I would seriously doubt that Gase would get offered the OC job, just my opinion though. I believe Fox/Manning would go for someone outside then hiring from within. |
I understand both lines of reasoning, hiring from within or without, and both have benefits. Personally I prefer "from within".
I like the continuity that would bring, both with our offense and with BO's development. I think it would benefit Brock immensely to work with the same people and same philosophy for the 1st few years of his career. |
I just dont think Gase is "ready" to be an OC. What has he done to warrant a promotion? Hes gone from WR coach to QB coach and then 2 years later he automatically deserves to be OC if McCoy leaves? Nah. Not me.
I also dont get the "BO development"? Since when does BO count for anything? Its Manning at the helm and in order to replace a strong leader in McCoy, you have to do that with another strong leader. Why cant they just leave Gase at QB coach? Isnt that better for BO's development?
Ive never heard from Fox's mouth, "Adam Gase has done a really good job with Peyton and Brock". He has said, "Mike and Peyton are working very well together". Thats key to me. Get someone to work well with Peyton. A 30-year-old WR/QB coach isnt that IMHO. |
The thing is, you, me, and anyone who isn't on the team have absolutely zero idea how well someone understands the offense, how well the coach, lead, etc...
Gase got the promotion once, and it's fairly logical to think that we will continue to promote from within as we have done before. I think that's much more likely than spending on high-priced coordinators which will inevitably be poached. The fact of the matter is, continuity is more important than the name.
As far as Osweiler's development, it's very relevant, whether you think so or not. We spent a second round pick on the guy. He's not some 6th round developmental rookie. He's going to be expected to be the guy after Manning. It's important to surround him with good coaching. Manning is going to be good in mostly every situation, but Osweiler is also a big investment for this team. _________________
Thanks, Tzimisce |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lomaxgr 
Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 21533 Location: Manchester, England
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
broncos67 wrote: | The thing is, you, me, and anyone who isn't on the team have absolutely zero idea how well someone understands the offense, how well the coach, lead, etc... |
Exactly. I don't understand how people are saying, "I don't want Gase" or "I want Gase". Does anyone know how football intelligent this guy is? I certainly don't. Does anyone know anything about his scheme preferences etc? It would be foolish to make any assumptions based on what we as fans know of him right now. _________________
MUFC OK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JerseysFinest27 
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 8861 Location: New Jersey... Props to Joe_Is_The_Best on the sig
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
broncos67 wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | AKRNA wrote: | JerseysFinest27 wrote: | McCoy might bring Gase with him for all we know. Those two came in together and have worked together (as OC and QB coach) for 3 years now. |
I think, as many have mentioned, that Gase would have the inside track at OC if McCoy left. That said, I doubt he'd leave a promotion in this franchise to follow McCoy to a failing one. |
I would seriously doubt that Gase would get offered the OC job, just my opinion though. I believe Fox/Manning would go for someone outside then hiring from within. |
I understand both lines of reasoning, hiring from within or without, and both have benefits. Personally I prefer "from within".
I like the continuity that would bring, both with our offense and with BO's development. I think it would benefit Brock immensely to work with the same people and same philosophy for the 1st few years of his career. |
I just dont think Gase is "ready" to be an OC. What has he done to warrant a promotion? Hes gone from WR coach to QB coach and then 2 years later he automatically deserves to be OC if McCoy leaves? Nah. Not me.
I also dont get the "BO development"? Since when does BO count for anything? Its Manning at the helm and in order to replace a strong leader in McCoy, you have to do that with another strong leader. Why cant they just leave Gase at QB coach? Isnt that better for BO's development?
Ive never heard from Fox's mouth, "Adam Gase has done a really good job with Peyton and Brock". He has said, "Mike and Peyton are working very well together". Thats key to me. Get someone to work well with Peyton. A 30-year-old WR/QB coach isnt that IMHO. |
The thing is, you, me, and anyone who isn't on the team have absolutely zero idea how well someone understands the offense, how well the coach, lead, etc...
Gase got the promotion once, and it's fairly logical to think that we will continue to promote from within as we have done before. I think that's much more likely than spending on high-priced coordinators which will inevitably be poached. The fact of the matter is, continuity is more important than the name.
As far as Osweiler's development, it's very relevant, whether you think so or not. We spent a second round pick on the guy. He's not some 6th round developmental rookie. He's going to be expected to be the guy after Manning. It's important to surround him with good coaching. Manning is going to be good in mostly every situation, but Osweiler is also a big investment for this team. |
Why does keeping Gase at QB coach effect Osweilers development? I never said that does, and to me, that makes more sense than to OC.
I look at it this way. Peyton Manning is the guy. Osweiler will be the guy in the future. If Peyton is at the helm, he has shown he likes a veteran OC (see all previous OC's hes had). I agree that Osweiler needs continuity. Keep Gase at QB coach allows Brock to see and work with the same guy every day. Moving Gase up to OC will only separate the relationship (i.e. Gase would then have to have his attention on all offensive players instead of independently focused on BO).
Also, lomaxgr, you are right. Nobody here has any proof hes not intelligent or if he understands football schematics well. We talk football in here based on reports and quotes form coaches. Just like Im doing with Adam Gase, we all did with Dennis Allen before he become DC. Nobody knows untill it happens. All I argue is that Peyton should have a veteran guy that has been around the league once or twice, not a 30yo coach who was coaching WR's 2 years ago and got the promotion when Ben McDaniels left. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AnAngryAmerican 
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 19487 Location: Loveland, CO
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
lomaxgr wrote: | broncos67 wrote: | The thing is, you, me, and anyone who isn't on the team have absolutely zero idea how well someone understands the offense, how well the coach, lead, etc... |
Exactly. I don't understand how people are saying, "I don't want Gase" or "I want Gase". Does anyone know how football intelligent this guy is? I certainly don't. Does anyone know anything about his scheme preferences etc? It would be foolish to make any assumptions based on what we as fans know of him right now. |
The only thing we can do is look at history, the team's performance and make our best guess. I'm around the team a lot and even I cannot make a real guesstimate as to what Gase would be like as an OC.
However, I am skeptical of anyone who came here with Mac. So I will have my doubts about Gase, should he become the OC, until he removes those doubts. _________________ big_palooka:
bhslinebacker wrote: | AAA is right, as he usually is. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lomaxgr 
Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 21533 Location: Manchester, England
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
AnAngryAmerican wrote: | lomaxgr wrote: | broncos67 wrote: | The thing is, you, me, and anyone who isn't on the team have absolutely zero idea how well someone understands the offense, how well the coach, lead, etc... |
Exactly. I don't understand how people are saying, "I don't want Gase" or "I want Gase". Does anyone know how football intelligent this guy is? I certainly don't. Does anyone know anything about his scheme preferences etc? It would be foolish to make any assumptions based on what we as fans know of him right now. |
The only thing we can do is look at history, the team's performance and make our best guess. I'm around the team a lot and even I cannot make a real guesstimate as to what Gase would be like as an OC.
However, I am skeptical of anyone who came here with Mac. So I will have my doubts about Gase, should he become the OC, until he removes those doubts. |
I think it is time you got over that. John Fox has trusted these guys to be here for 2 years now. If they weren't up to the task, they would be gone by now (like Xanders). You said the same about Russell poisoning the minds of our entire scouting department when draft picks were made, and since then we clearly know this isn't the case.
This is the NFL - N(ot)F(or)L(ong). Holdovers aren't kept on for 2 years unless they have earned the right to do so. _________________
MUFC OK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|