| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Bigger loss? |
| Terrell Suggs |
|
56% |
[ 25 ] |
| Jason Peters |
|
43% |
[ 19 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 44 |
|
| Author |
Message |
eaglesfan10
Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Posts: 10015
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:36 pm Post subject: Who is a bigger loss Jason Peters or Terrell Suggs? |
 |
|
|
I understand they both play different positions, but who do you think is the bigger loss to their respective teams?
Sugg's replacements are a rotation of Paul Kruger, Albert McClellan, and Courtney Upshaw.
Peter's replacements are a rotation of King Dunlap and Demetress Bell.
_________________
 [quote="Phire"]Cooper will fight every Raider there.[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 90850
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think Peters is more important. Without Peters the Eagles OL is pretty much bad. Suggs off the ravens D is still a good defense
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 22683
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | I think Peters is more important. Without Peters the Eagles OL is pretty much bad. Suggs off the ravens D is still a good defense |
the ravens D has played mediocre this year, they arent the same without T-sizzle. Also that Eagles O-line wasnt really good to begin with and hes not protecting mike vick's blindside.
so i would say T-sizzle.
_________________
"I'm not in danger, I AM the DANGER" - Heisenberg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 40372
Location: "Are you hungry, child?" Yes, she thought, but not for food.
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Pass Rush > Proctection. Atleast you can help with TE/RB's, but if you have to blitz all day to get pressure you can be in problems.
_________________
Kiltman on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OneBadCat
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 726
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jason Peters without a doubt. Michael Vick gets blasted every week. LT is one of the most important positions in football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JammerHammer21
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 39579
Location: Anywhere
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Jason Peters without a doubt. Michael Vick gets blasted every week. LT is one of the most important positions in football. |
It isn't Vick's blindside. Not saying that makes him unimportant, but still. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 22683
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Jason Peters without a doubt. Michael Vick gets blasted every week. LT is one of the most important positions in football. |
You do know that michael vick's left side isnt his blindside. In general youre right regarding the importance of the LT but its not applicable to vick.
_________________
"I'm not in danger, I AM the DANGER" - Heisenberg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OneBadCat
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 726
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Peter's was still the best LT in the game in his prime. He would have made an absolute difference. The Raven's are still a formidable defense. Plus they have the "it's the Ravens defense " factor. Similar to the Steelers, it's a next man up mentality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WhackyPlague
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 5071
Location: Orlando, FL
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Peters, because his replacements are worse. Turned a pretty good OL into a pretty bad one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47615
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Suggs is a much better player, but the Ravens can replace him easier than the Eagles can replace Peters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 17978
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Suggs is a much better player, but the Ravens can replace him easier than the Eagles can replace Peters. |
They can? Because the games iv'e seen so far this year from the Ravens they have put a mediocre at best pass rush on the field.
_________________
El ramster on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Meco
Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 2598
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Anyone voting Suggs clearly hasn't seen the state of the Eagles offensive line. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kmvoss
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2223
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I couldn't vote Suggs. I have felt bad for Vick the entire season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Estonianzulu
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 27078
Location: Middle of Nowhere VA
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Ketchup wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Suggs is a much better player, but the Ravens can replace him easier than the Eagles can replace Peters. |
They can? Because the games iv'e seen so far this year from the Ravens they have put a mediocre at best pass rush on the field. |
I think that at this point the Eagles would be happy with mediocre OL play
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flaccomania
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 33730
Location: Hashtag BirdCity
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's tough to say whether the drop off in our defense is due to Terrell or the new system, but either way, our defense has looked pretty meh so far this year, particularly our pass offense. A lot of that has to do with the lack of a pass rush, but it also has to do with our press corners playing off coverage. So, it's tough to say.
I went Peters for the sake of this poll.
_________________
[quote="SFPatsFan"]
Flaccomania is a genius who is an expert on literally everything he talks about so you should trust him. [/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
