| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| NFL's Best Defense? |
| Seattle Seahawks |
|
15% |
[ 13 ] |
| Houston Texans |
|
15% |
[ 13 ] |
| San Francisco 49ers |
|
61% |
[ 52 ] |
| Other |
|
8% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 85 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Rosstafarian 
Joined: 04 Aug 2011 Posts: 616
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Russell2Bailey wrote: | | Quick question for Texans Fans. Is Darryl Sharpton on I.R.? or is he somehow worse than Bradie James or the coaches would just rather play a vet? |
PUP. Bradie James and Tim Dobbins are probably going to be the guys going forward with Mister Alexander and Daryl Sharpton possibly getting time (Once Sharpton comes off of PUP). The problem with Sharpton is he hasn't played football in a long long time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EliteTexan80 
 Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 37208 Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rosstafarian wrote: | | The problem with Sharpton is he hasn't played football in a long long time. |
Agreed, guy just can't stay healthy. First it was the quad, then the hip - these are injuries that have the risk of compouding upon one another, only making the whole package worse.
I really don't hold much hope to see Sharpton make a big impact. This year, or next year. The injuries he has are pretty significant. _________________
iPwn, Kempes and Flaccomania: The official sig makers for THE ET80! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16524 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poster4613
Joined: 27 Jul 2012 Posts: 158
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. |
The 49ers allow .6 less points per game and the Seahawks allow .2 less points per game. The Seahawks allow 32.6 less yards every game and the 49ers allow 28.6 yards per game.
I think it's incredibly close between the 49ers, Seahawks, Texans, and Bears and while I don't feel any team has done enough to establish itself as the best defense at this point. I think it's obvious the Seahawks don't belong in the conversation because I hate them, but I think in a few weeks we will have a more definitive number 1 (unless it's the Seahawks because I hate them). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16524 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Poster4613 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. |
The 49ers allow .6 less points per game and the Seahawks allow .2 less points per game. The Seahawks allow 32.6 less yards every game and the 49ers allow 28.6 yards per game.
I think it's incredibly close between the 49ers, Seahawks, Texans, and Bears and while I don't feel any team has done enough to establish itself as the best defense at this point. I think it's obvious the Seahawks don't belong in the conversation because I hate them, but I think in a few weeks we will have a more definitive number 1 (unless it's the Seahawks because I hate them). | The Bears and 49ers are both listed as having allowed 6 total TDs, however 1 of the Bears "receiving TDs against" is actually a fake FG by the Packers. So in reality that accounts for the 3 pt difference in points scored. Even if you want to disregard that, there is no way you can w/ a straight face argue that those 3 points over 5 games is better than the 9 add'l sacks, 9 add'l TOs, the 5 more TDs scored, a better 3rd down %, and a QBR of 16 fewer points.
Next.... _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baysik
Joined: 06 Oct 2011 Posts: 196
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | Poster4613 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. |
The 49ers allow .6 less points per game and the Seahawks allow .2 less points per game. The Seahawks allow 32.6 less yards every game and the 49ers allow 28.6 yards per game.
I think it's incredibly close between the 49ers, Seahawks, Texans, and Bears and while I don't feel any team has done enough to establish itself as the best defense at this point. I think it's obvious the Seahawks don't belong in the conversation because I hate them, but I think in a few weeks we will have a more definitive number 1 (unless it's the Seahawks because I hate them). | The Bears and 49ers are both listed as having allowed 6 total TDs, however 1 of the Bears "receiving TDs against" is actually a fake FG by the Packers. So in reality that accounts for the 3 pt difference in points scored. Even if you want to disregard that, there is no way you can w/ a straight face argue that those 3 points over 5 games is better than the 9 add'l sacks, 9 add'l TOs, the 5 more TDs scored, a better 3rd down %, and a QBR of 16 fewer points.
Next.... |
the 49ers 'gave up' a kickoff runback td to green bay with a clear block in the back.
road goes both ways, see? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16524 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| baysik wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | Poster4613 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. |
The 49ers allow .6 less points per game and the Seahawks allow .2 less points per game. The Seahawks allow 32.6 less yards every game and the 49ers allow 28.6 yards per game.
I think it's incredibly close between the 49ers, Seahawks, Texans, and Bears and while I don't feel any team has done enough to establish itself as the best defense at this point. I think it's obvious the Seahawks don't belong in the conversation because I hate them, but I think in a few weeks we will have a more definitive number 1 (unless it's the Seahawks because I hate them). | The Bears and 49ers are both listed as having allowed 6 total TDs, however 1 of the Bears "receiving TDs against" is actually a fake FG by the Packers. So in reality that accounts for the 3 pt difference in points scored. Even if you want to disregard that, there is no way you can w/ a straight face argue that those 3 points over 5 games is better than the 9 add'l sacks, 9 add'l TOs, the 5 more TDs scored, a better 3rd down %, and a QBR of 16 fewer points.
Next.... |
the 49ers 'gave up' a kickoff runback td to green bay with a clear block in the back.
road goes both ways, see? | But that kickoff runback doesn't count against the defense, that's already logged as a ST TD. The fake FG is logged as an offensive TD (TD Reception) even though neither the offense nor the defense was on the field. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baysik
Joined: 06 Oct 2011 Posts: 196
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | baysik wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | Poster4613 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. |
The 49ers allow .6 less points per game and the Seahawks allow .2 less points per game. The Seahawks allow 32.6 less yards every game and the 49ers allow 28.6 yards per game.
I think it's incredibly close between the 49ers, Seahawks, Texans, and Bears and while I don't feel any team has done enough to establish itself as the best defense at this point. I think it's obvious the Seahawks don't belong in the conversation because I hate them, but I think in a few weeks we will have a more definitive number 1 (unless it's the Seahawks because I hate them). | The Bears and 49ers are both listed as having allowed 6 total TDs, however 1 of the Bears "receiving TDs against" is actually a fake FG by the Packers. So in reality that accounts for the 3 pt difference in points scored. Even if you want to disregard that, there is no way you can w/ a straight face argue that those 3 points over 5 games is better than the 9 add'l sacks, 9 add'l TOs, the 5 more TDs scored, a better 3rd down %, and a QBR of 16 fewer points.
Next.... |
the 49ers 'gave up' a kickoff runback td to green bay with a clear block in the back.
road goes both ways, see? | But that kickoff runback doesn't count against the defense, that's already logged as a ST TD. The fake FG is logged as an offensive TD (TD Reception) even though neither the offense nor the defense was on the field. |
oo theres something i didnt know. cool. well i guess the only other one i have to offer is a completely out of character foible by our own frank gore that game MIN a grossly short field in our only loss.
but to your point, i am very much aware of how good the bears have been on D these past few weeks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16524 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| baysik wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | baysik wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | Poster4613 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | o_0 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | The lack of respect for the Bears D disturbs me. |
Why? The Bears aren't the best qdefense in the NFL, and that its what this thread is about. | Please explain how anybody is better, I can immediately shoot down your argument w/ little effort. |
The 49ers allow .6 less points per game and the Seahawks allow .2 less points per game. The Seahawks allow 32.6 less yards every game and the 49ers allow 28.6 yards per game.
I think it's incredibly close between the 49ers, Seahawks, Texans, and Bears and while I don't feel any team has done enough to establish itself as the best defense at this point. I think it's obvious the Seahawks don't belong in the conversation because I hate them, but I think in a few weeks we will have a more definitive number 1 (unless it's the Seahawks because I hate them). | The Bears and 49ers are both listed as having allowed 6 total TDs, however 1 of the Bears "receiving TDs against" is actually a fake FG by the Packers. So in reality that accounts for the 3 pt difference in points scored. Even if you want to disregard that, there is no way you can w/ a straight face argue that those 3 points over 5 games is better than the 9 add'l sacks, 9 add'l TOs, the 5 more TDs scored, a better 3rd down %, and a QBR of 16 fewer points.
Next.... |
the 49ers 'gave up' a kickoff runback td to green bay with a clear block in the back.
road goes both ways, see? | But that kickoff runback doesn't count against the defense, that's already logged as a ST TD. The fake FG is logged as an offensive TD (TD Reception) even though neither the offense nor the defense was on the field. |
oo theres something i didnt know. cool. well i guess the only other one i have to offer is a completely out of character foible by our own frank gore that game MIN a grossly short field in our only loss.
but to your point, i am very much aware of how good the bears have been on D these past few weeks | And to your point I have no problem w/ anyone saying the 49ers are the best Defense, I have a huge problem w/ people acting like the Bears aren't in the conversation. How on earth can you lead 3 major defensive statistics, be top 5 in all others and not be considered elite? That makes no sense. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
streetlight3989 
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd give my vote to the Niners.
The Cardinals, Texans, Seahawks, Bears, and Eagles are in the conversation though. After that I see a pretty big drop off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finsyanksmancs 
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 3701 Location: Raleighwood
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Dolphins do NOT have the best defense and shouldn't be in the conversation for best, however; they do belong in the very good category some people have been making. Best run D in the league right now has to get them in that category. _________________
Sig by: PatsDynasty21 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|