Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

The Howard Mudd/Vick dynamic
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Philadelphia Eagles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Django


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 2847
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:10 am    Post subject: The Howard Mudd/Vick dynamic Reply with quote

Honestly, I think the Eagles made a mistake TWO years ago. No no no, not the Vick contract. Which in hindsight is a mistake.

But in all honesty, when they moved Juan from OLine coach and brought in Howard Mudd.

The Mudd experiment has been atrocious. Vick got sacked more under Juan's Oline, but it was clear it was because he held the ball to long. These Olineman now are just weak. Mudd's system makes things more complicated for a QB who likes things less complex.

Im not saying Mudd is a bad oline coach. Im just saying his philosophy is a terrible fit for a QB like Vick. Quick throws, a cerebral QB....they fit Mudd's system better. Marty calls plays that fits Vick's strength, but the Oline isnt built to protect him on those plays.

Get a cerebral QB in there and the Oline wont look bad. If Vick somehow survives the season, gets to the playoffs. I'd still get rid of Mudd if they are intent on bringing Vick back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PowerElite


Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 8808
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem is that Mudd's lines have always given up big time sack totals before Peyton Manning made him look good. I made a thread on this which is now locked.

Quote:
San Diego Chargers (19741976) 23, 50, 46
San Francisco 49ers (1977) 36
Seattle Seahawks (19781982) 44, 23, 51, 37, 36
Cleveland Browns (19831988) 33, 55, 36, 39, 29, 36
Kansas City Chiefs (19891992) 23, 22, 21, 48
Seattle Seahawks (19931997) 48, 40, 45, 38, 36

Those are the sack totals during the years he coached with those teams.

http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=459788&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RainbowCarebear


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 34682
Location: "Are you hungry, child?" Yes, she thought, but not for food.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.
_________________

"Do you imagine Whoresbane loves you any better? If you did not hold the ..., he would pull out your entrails and make you eat them"
"In return, we swore that we should always be their men"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Django


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 2847
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PowerElite wrote:
The problem is that Mudd's lines have always given up big time sack totals before Peyton Manning made him look good. I made a thread on this which is now locked.

Quote:
San Diego Chargers (19741976) 23, 50, 46
San Francisco 49ers (1977) 36
Seattle Seahawks (19781982) 44, 23, 51, 37, 36
Cleveland Browns (19831988) 33, 55, 36, 39, 29, 36
Kansas City Chiefs (19891992) 23, 22, 21, 48
Seattle Seahawks (19931997) 48, 40, 45, 38, 36

Those are the sack totals during the years he coached with those teams.

http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=459788&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0


Ouch. I guess this points to the greatest of Peyton Manning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Remixxxxxxx


Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Posts: 12273
Location: E808 on the avi; P90 on the sig
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Django


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 2847
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remixxxxxxx wrote:
RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.


Boy...just bad decisions all way around in 2011...that still are hurting the Eagles now...

Cant protect the QB, cant sack the QB. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RainbowCarebear


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 34682
Location: "Are you hungry, child?" Yes, she thought, but not for food.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remixxxxxxx wrote:
RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.


Added some talented players, but that could've been in a different system.

I have nothing against Mudd and Washburn, my hatred go further up.
_________________

"Do you imagine Whoresbane loves you any better? If you did not hold the ..., he would pull out your entrails and make you eat them"
"In return, we swore that we should always be their men"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Remixxxxxxx


Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Posts: 12273
Location: E808 on the avi; P90 on the sig
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RainbowCarebear wrote:
Remixxxxxxx wrote:
RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.


Added some talented players, but that could've been in a different system.

I have nothing against Mudd and Washburn, my hatred go further up.


Well obviously there's other issues to be layed out, but these two guys have brought nothing to our team. I was under the impression that Washburn would have our dudes getting 3-5 sacks per game and that Mudd would be protecting Michael Vick flawlessly.

It's time for everyone to go, starting with Reid and including everyone on the staff, aside from Bowles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
McNabbMcFadden


Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 34334
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remixxxxxxx wrote:
RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.

QFTMFT
_________________
"Break the rules, but first break the rulers."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky_b27


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 21144
Location: Nottingham, England
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remixxxxxxx wrote:
RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.


Damn straight!

Problem is Reid wasn't going to move juan to dc unless he got a 'good' o line coach, so that's why we got a mudd Washburn combo
_________________



RainbowCarebear wrote:
Marky > Foles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky_b27


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 21144
Location: Nottingham, England
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Django wrote:
Remixxxxxxx wrote:
RainbowCarebear wrote:
Mudd & Washburn is a team. But I still would prefer a complete overhaul.


and they both have done more bad then good here.


Boy...just bad decisions all way around in 2011...that still are hurting the Eagles now...

Cant protect the QB, cant sack the QB. Rolling Eyes


Trying to build the dream team without any dynamics or chemistry
_________________



RainbowCarebear wrote:
Marky > Foles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nlesthought


Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 8411
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My frustrated self says everyone must go, EVERYONE.

My realistic self says that's not possible until we see an utter failure. Meaning no playoffs and complete mayhem within the lockerroom.

My defiant self says put Foles in there he has 12 days to prepare, lets see what he can do either A I will be right all along and the Offense is too predictable and AR is getting out coached or B we can can salvage the season hopefully and make a mini-run.

On the topic...

I can't blame Mudd for these guys having no sense of awareness simple stunts, delayed blitzes and of course better DL play is the reason Vick is getting crushed. We all know this isn't a quick passing attack we use.
_________________


psn: nlesthought l Peppers90 on the sig

Bird Watch '13 - Placekicker #6 - Alex 'the podiatrist' Henery.
22/27 LNG 51yds; 42 XPs; 1 KOR TD given up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phire


Moderator
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 48367
Location: #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #Merica #TrollyRangers #Danes #BirdGang
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A) If we didn't lose 40% of our line we're having a different discussion

B) Washburn's wide-9 has flaws but our defense has greatly improved since he's gotten here
_________________

theuntouchable wrote:
Think about this phire. I am the real chow.

RainbowCarebear wrote:
Only for the quick and lucky.

Danish proverb 3:69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Remixxxxxxx


Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Posts: 12273
Location: E808 on the avi; P90 on the sig
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A) If we didn't lose 40% of our line we're having a different discussion


I do agree with this, but it's not like Bell was even half this bad last year in Buffalo, and the offensive lineman[Watkins] he "picked out" is an absolute bum. The system does not work, it's not working now, it didn't work last year, we just were able to mask it behind JPs play.

Quote:
B) Washburn's wide-9 has flaws but our defense has greatly improved since he's gotten here


I don't think the defensive line[his job] has gotten any better since he's been here. I actually believe they've gotten progressively worse since his arrival. The defense is playing better because we actually have real linebackers, playing in the correct spots, and our team tackling is much better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RainbowCarebear


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 34682
Location: "Are you hungry, child?" Yes, she thought, but not for food.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would rather save Foles. Let Vick take the beating and cut him in the off season.

Also right now Andy believes we have the best chance of winning with Vick, and I can't fault him there. Not with this Oline.
_________________

"Do you imagine Whoresbane loves you any better? If you did not hold the ..., he would pull out your entrails and make you eat them"
"In return, we swore that we should always be their men"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Philadelphia Eagles All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group