Percy Harvin vs. Desean Jackson

Drizzle215 · Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:13 pm Post subject: Percy Harvin vs. Desean Jackson

I remember telling people that Percy would be better then Desean Jackson, but nobody believed me. Both men are versatile when need be, Percy at running back and kick returner, while Desean is a great punt returner (even though the Eagles seem to have forgotten that). They are their QB's #1 reciever and have put themselves on the map as 2 of the most dangerous home run hitters in the game today. Ironically, they struggle with each other's specialities, Percy "lacks" deep threat ability while Desean is labeled a "one trick pony" but they are dangerous in their crafts. Who would you take?
_________________

R.I.P. Michael Jackson 1958-2009. You will be missed...and I KNOW you were never a pedofile.

DetroitSpirit · Joined: 25 Feb 2012 Posts: 3280 Location: Michigan

w4rrior723 · Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 5365

DeSean is a fragile deep-threat who shies away from contact.

Percy is a dynamic playmaker who can score from anywhere on the field by using his power and speed.

Not even a discussion.

dbronx42 · Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 3986 Location: Mile High 303

bmore4life815 · Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 3516 Location: HoCo, MD

I'll go with the guy who's not only the much better overall player, but doesn't pack it in for the year when things aren't going his way.
_________________

mike23md

vikingsrule · Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:22 am Post subject:

Its interesting, these players couldnt be more polar opposites of one another.

One is a PR, the other is a KR.

One is only a deep threat, the other does everything but go deep.

One is weak and shies away from contact, the other is as strong as a bull and embraces contact.

One is one dimensional, the other is multidimensional.

Give me Harvin.

HawaiiFan808 · Joined: 05 Jan 2009 Posts: 3066 Location: Honolulu, HI

Percy and it's not even close. Hoping Randall Cobb can be GB's Percy Harvin.
_________________

bucsfan333 · Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:33 am Post subject:

Did you come up with this just to see Percy Harvin win? They're not even similar players.
_________________

Adopt-a-Buc Mike Evans 11 RECs 169 YDs 2 TDs

AlexM23 · Joined: 03 Jan 2011 Posts: 8357 Location: Australia

eagles101 · Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 10239

RandyMossIsBoss · Joined: 01 Jun 2012 Posts: 24919 Location: Kilt on the sig

DeSean has improved mightily this season, and I think he can be a consistent 1000 yard receiver for years to come.

That being said I voted Percy without hesitation. Don't really see the point of this thread though, I didn't even think it was close.
_________________

Bird Watch: Jordan Matthews 7 Rec // 114 Yds // 1 TD

broncos67 · Joined: 28 Dec 2006 Posts: 23524 Location: Conshohocken

Lamborghini Percy, not even a doubt in my mind.
_________________

Thanks, Tzimisce

Drizzle215 · Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:01 am Post subject:

I think Percy is better, but I think that this is a closer argument then you think. Desean is actually playing a bit rougher despite his fragile frame. I'm sure you guys have watched the Ravens game for example, and he did wonders against the Giants as well. I would take Percy over Desean, but sports fans that I argue with (barbershop, and friends from the "lets talk sports" fan page on Facebook) say Jackson is better.

I live in Philly, so maybe the barbershop is a bit biased, but if individuals from other parts of the U.S. are saying the same thing, I figured this would be a legit argument.
_________________

R.I.P. Michael Jackson 1958-2009. You will be missed...and I KNOW you were never a pedofile.

tom cody · Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 11991 Location: Canada

Percy Harvin
_________________
Q: Why was six scared of seven?
A: Because seven "ate" nine.

Courtesy of an online joke search

w4rrior723 · Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 5365

I just realized that my post makes it seem like I think DeSean is a bad player. That's not the case. When he has a good QB throwing to him, he's an elite deep-threat. He's just not that versatile, and pretty soft.