| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mastercheddaar
Joined: 14 Dec 2006
Posts: 4268
Location: Northeast Ohio.. Obviously
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:15 pm Post subject: hmmm |
 |
|
|
For Cleveland I would rather have 11, 12, 13 or a trade back than the 3rd DE in a weak draft.
That is all
Mastercheddaar
_________________
For those that don't know:
NFL - AFC Browns, NFC Eagles
Basket Ball - Cavs
Baseball - Indians/Yankees.
CF - Ohio State and Wake Forest
Women - Brunettes with Blue eyes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nobody
Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 1579
Location: Final Four and counting!
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ask and I shall receive?  Thank you, love the pick, don't you dare change it.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18354
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Don't like the change for the Titans. I'd go with Dion Jordan instead and then go John Jenkins in the 2nd.
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikek163
Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 4670
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
It is a good Chiefs draft but if we take a WR in the 2nd that means we let Bowe walk, and that doesn't settle well with me.
_________________
Knock knock. Who's there? The guy that finished second! The guy that finished second who? Exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mike23md
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 6494
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:21 am Post subject: Re: hmmm |
|
|
|
| Mastercheddaar wrote: | For Cleveland I would rather have 11, 12, 13 or a trade back than the 3rd DE in a weak draft.
That is all
Mastercheddaar |
I feel that, but I am not doing any trades in my mock...gets messy.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mike23md
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 6494
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mikek163 wrote: | | It is a good Chiefs draft but if we take a WR in the 2nd that means we let Bowe walk, and that doesn't settle well with me. |
Not necessarily. Getting Geno Smith and only having Bowe to throw to when Breaston is not a #2 really makes it difficult for him to progress. Signing Bowe and drafting a WR in the second gives him more weapons.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mike23md
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 6494
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ttitansfan4life wrote: | | Don't like the change for the Titans. I'd go with Dion Jordan instead and then go John Jenkins in the 2nd. |
I just cannot see Jordan going that high, even at 10 I think he's a bit high but it was the best DE on the board where Cleveland was picking. Werner is rated higher and that is why I went with him for Tennessee.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I <3 Faulk
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 1597
Location: straight out of Compton.
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bulger2holt wrote: | | The Rams won't take 2 WR's with 2 of their first 3 picks. But if they take Williams with one of their firsts and Woods is sitting there in rd 2, he might be hard to pass on. I guess you can never say never. |
Pretty much this. I would say the only wide receivers that are a lock to make the squad next year are Amendola, Quick, and Givens. So they grab Williams to pair with Givens ( or Quick, but IMO Givens) on the outside. I don't see why they would grab Woods. He would be a great get in the second, but that's 5 receivers. I don't see how we would make the most of them. If course, they could go Woods thinking that Amendola will likely miss a couple games.
Williams, Givens, Amendola, Woods, Quick?
If Quick doesn't catch on soon, he could find himself getting buried on the depth chart.
_________________
| adam9 wrote: |
One of the best posts I've ever read... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maladeen3917
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 2421
Location: NWK NJ
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
absolutely sold on this rams draft.
Drafting Warmack, Williams, and Woods would do wonders for Bradford's development. We would essentially have a brand new wideout corps of Amendola, Givens, Quick, Williams, Woods, deadly in my opinion especially if Quick comes on strong next year. Also warmack is a monster in the run game as well.
_________________
The Fastest Thing Under The Arch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mike23md
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 6494
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| maladeen3917 wrote: | absolutely sold on this rams draft.
Drafting Warmack, Williams, and Woods would do wonders for Bradford's development. We would essentially have a brand new wideout corps of Amendola, Givens, Quick, Williams, Woods, deadly in my opinion especially if Quick comes on strong next year. Also warmack is a monster in the run game as well. |
Yeah, Amendola is such a perfect slot WR. That is where I envisioned him to play and you are right, this will help the development of Bradford. He is not a bad QB but he needs time to get through his progressions.
Having Jeff Fisher as the HC, he wont give up on Bradford too quickly and I think he looks to improve that offense especially since they missed out on Blackmon last year.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 22671
Location: Avenging his brother by slaying three of Prince Rhaegar's bannermen and later Rodrik Greyjoy
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like Joeckel and I love the value of Richardson
_________________
"Of gold and silver and gemstones, it had none; bronze and iron were the metals of winter"
"He is part of you, Robb. To fear him is to fear you."
"These are northmen, Uncle. The north remembers." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
#1CARDSFAN
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 23284
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Manti Teo would be tough to pass on but I love Barkley. Good pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
#1CARDSFAN
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 23284
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lane Johnson makes alot of sense in the second round. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
waremd
Joined: 27 Jan 2012
Posts: 933
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rtnldave wrote: | | No thanks from Cowboys fan. Jenkins....um, yeah if we can get an O lineman in the 2nd and 3rd. We draft another LB or CB in the 1st or 2nd round and I will personally sneak Jerry Jones! |
We would be getting Matthews in the first round, DT help would be perfect here..
_________________
Future Starting Safety for the Cowboys
^---Props to thesickness89 for the sig ---^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bulger2holt
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 1124
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mike23md wrote: | | maladeen3917 wrote: | absolutely sold on this rams draft.
Drafting Warmack, Williams, and Woods would do wonders for Bradford's development. We would essentially have a brand new wideout corps of Amendola, Givens, Quick, Williams, Woods, deadly in my opinion especially if Quick comes on strong next year. Also warmack is a monster in the run game as well. |
Yeah, Amendola is such a perfect slot WR. That is where I envisioned him to play and you are right, this will help the development of Bradford. He is not a bad QB but he needs time to get through his progressions.
Having Jeff Fisher as the HC, he wont give up on Bradford too quickly and I think he looks to improve that offense especially since they missed out on Blackmon last year. |
The Rams never wanted Blackmon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
