| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Its A Sabotage 
 Joined: 14 May 2010 Posts: 27997 Location: Do. Your. Job.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:47 am Post subject: Bills GM wants to trade Up for a QB |
|
|
|
What realistically would you trade to move from 2 to 10 [projected] so that Buffalo is able to land one of the other 4 Quarterbacks in this draft?
For me I take 10, 42, 2013 1st and a 2013 4th with other considerations. _________________
| green24 wrote: | | Sabo is the best poster on FF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adrenaline_Flux 
Joined: 19 Dec 2008 Posts: 15010 Location: The Iowa
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I just hope he trades with us.
To move from #6 to #2, Washington gave up 3 first rounders (#6, 2013, 2014) and a second rounder (#39) so I'd expect to at least get something similar to that.
I REALLY hope we're the team he decides to sell the farm too. THAT WOULD BE REALLY COOL. _________________
Sig Credit: iPwn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
corry 
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 2421 Location: Orlando, FL
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I'd do it in a heart beat. The only thing that will hinder the trade is that most of the teams ahead of them don't need QB's. That, and who would he trade up for? I don't see the star/can't miss guy this year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaguarfan 
Joined: 27 Nov 2011 Posts: 11274 Location: Scarlet Town
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Please get this done. _________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tugboat 
Joined: 30 Mar 2011 Posts: 1309
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:53 pm Post subject: Re: Bills GM wants to trade Up for a QB |
|
|
|
| Its A Sabotage wrote: | What realistically would you trade to move from 2 to 10 [projected] so that Buffalo is able to land one of the other 4 Quarterbacks in this draft?
For me I take 10, 42, 2013 1st and a 2013 4th with other considerations. |
Deal, no take backs.
I'd be plenty happy with that return.
I know it's natural to mention the Redskins deal last year, but i don't think that's really an applicable benchmark for this situation. RGIII was a bit of a special case. I wouldn't expect quite the ludicrous haul that netted in this scenario.
But an extra 1st rounder, a 2nd and 4th to move down to 10? I'll take that. There's bound to still be a solid player on the board at that point, and we truly have the luxury of having so many needs at all kinds of positions, that there's bound to be a guy we really like at a position of great need for us. Add in a couple extra potential high-end young starters in the next couple years...Yes Please.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AngryPirate
Joined: 29 Aug 2009 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
i live near buffalo listen to WGR everyday, Buddy Nix did say that but he wont sell the "farm" to move up IMO, even tho every Bills fan at this point in time would. In the end Nix will say we tried to move up but the asking price was just to high. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. V 
Joined: 07 Sep 2011 Posts: 2604 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
3 1st round picks and a 2nd and 3rd round pick this year at least. _________________
Thank you daboyle250 for the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaguarCrazy2832 
Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 73424
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
is it worth it though if we continue to pass on getting a franchise QB? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaguarfan 
Joined: 27 Nov 2011 Posts: 11274 Location: Scarlet Town
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The article I saw made it sound like the Bills wanted to trade up into the late first round from the 2nd......... _________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wow you guys are optimistic
You're not going to get 3+ first and other picks. A bet you may get a 1st 2nd and an additional pick. You're not going to get what Washington gave for RG3 because there is no RG3 in this class. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iPwn 
 Joined: 10 Oct 2009 Posts: 35195 Location: Stand United
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaMike wrote: | Wow you guys are optimistic
You're not going to get 3+ first and other picks. A bet you may get a 1st 2nd and an additional pick. You're not going to get what Washington gave for RG3 because there is no RG3 in this class. | It was clearly said in jest.
You also need to resize your avatar. It is far too big. The rules state they can be no bigger than 80x80 pixels. _________________
 | samgurl775 wrote: | | It's alright iPwn, you're my #1. |
| EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adrenaline_Flux 
Joined: 19 Dec 2008 Posts: 15010 Location: The Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaMike wrote: | Wow you guys are optimistic
You're not going to get 3+ first and other picks. A bet you may get a 1st 2nd and an additional pick. You're not going to get what Washington gave for RG3 because there is no RG3 in this class. |
What about Randall Grant III from Wesleyan? _________________
Sig Credit: iPwn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | DaMike wrote: | Wow you guys are optimistic
You're not going to get 3+ first and other picks. A bet you may get a 1st 2nd and an additional pick. You're not going to get what Washington gave for RG3 because there is no RG3 in this class. | It was clearly said in jest.
You also need to resize your avatar. It is far too big. The rules state they can be no bigger than 80x80 pixels. | Gotcha. I didn't think it was a joke. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikeyfarley 
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 4316 Location: floride
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaMike wrote: | Wow you guys are optimistic
You're not going to get 3+ first and other picks. A bet you may get a 1st 2nd and an additional pick. You're not going to get what Washington gave for RG3 because there is no RG3 in this class. | Have you even watched a single draft before? No one can move up to #2 overall without giving up multiple 1st round picks and a lot more. Do some research before you talk a load of crap. _________________
| scrimmage wrote: | | Tebow just went PREIST MODE |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mikeyfarley wrote: | | DaMike wrote: | Wow you guys are optimistic
You're not going to get 3+ first and other picks. A bet you may get a 1st 2nd and an additional pick. You're not going to get what Washington gave for RG3 because there is no RG3 in this class. | Have you even watched a single draft before? No one can move up to #2 overall without giving up multiple 1st round picks and a lot more. Do some research before you talk a load of crap. | That doesn't matter. Buffalo would be trading up for a player. There isn't a QB in this class worth that. Hence why it wouldn't happen. Hence why the others in here were joking about getting that. Yes the normal compensation is typically more then I stated but no one is going to give up that much for a QB in this class. Especially when they can trade up from there 2nd round pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|