NFL Forum :: - Timothy Tebow to Jaguars -- Done Deal Says Mort

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

Timothy Tebow to Jaguars -- Done Deal Says Mort
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Jacksonville Jaguars

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

MileHighNuck

Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 341

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:05 am Post subject:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Jaguarfan

Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11392
Location: Scarlet Town

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:13 am Post subject:

MileHighNuck wrote:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.
_________________

Kempes on the sig

TheVillain112 wrote:

Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it?

MileHighNuck

Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 341

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:17 am Post subject:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

Guess you were busy when it was on tv. He was definitely the best Bronco and had a very solid performance.

Jaguarfan

Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11392
Location: Scarlet Town

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:20 am Post subject:

MileHighNuck wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

Guess you were busy when it was on tv. He was definitely the best Bronco and had a very solid performance.

No, I watched the game. He looked absolutely horrendous passing the ball, as usual. He had a few good runs. A nice 30 yarder. Cool. Didn't play well, and that's why they got blown out.
_________________

Kempes on the sig

TheVillain112 wrote:

Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it?

MileHighNuck

Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 341

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:29 am Post subject:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

Guess you were busy when it was on tv. He was definitely the best Bronco and had a very solid performance.

No, I watched the game. He looked absolutely horrendous passing the ball, as usual. He had a few good runs. A nice 30 yarder. Cool. Didn't play well, and that's why they got blown out.

He looked just fine throwing the ball.... Horrendous would be many interceptions and missed attempts. He didn't have those. They got blown out because they were playing the Patriots and thats just what the Pats do. Expecting 45+ points is just not reasonable.

His track record has been beaten to death by critics but that 1st NE game has been left pretty well alone, he was good, no doubt.

Jaguarfan

Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11392
Location: Scarlet Town

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:32 am Post subject:

MileHighNuck wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

Guess you were busy when it was on tv. He was definitely the best Bronco and had a very solid performance.

No, I watched the game. He looked absolutely horrendous passing the ball, as usual. He had a few good runs. A nice 30 yarder. Cool. Didn't play well, and that's why they got blown out.

Looking horrendous throwing the ball is missing receivers completely and throwing the ball out of reach of even the defender. Which is what Tebow does. Routinely.
_________________

Kempes on the sig

TheVillain112 wrote:

Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it?

MileHighNuck

Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 341

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:37 am Post subject:

'Routinely' would not include that game.

Jaguarfan

Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11392
Location: Scarlet Town

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:38 am Post subject:

MileHighNuck wrote:

'Routinely' would not include that game.

It absolutely would.
_________________

Kempes on the sig

TheVillain112 wrote:

Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it?

Tugboat

Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:07 am Post subject:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

MileHighNuck wrote:

iPwn wrote:

Quote:

And if we go to post-season, Tebow beating the Steelers >>>> Gabbert's whole career

We grade players on single games now? Can I say that his two games against the Pats are worse than anything Gabbert has done too, or is that not allowed?

No you cant cuz he was pretty dang good in the 1st one.

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

Guess you were busy when it was on tv. He was definitely the best Bronco and had a very solid performance.

No, I watched the game. He looked absolutely horrendous passing the ball, as usual. He had a few good runs. A nice 30 yarder. Cool. Didn't play well, and that's why they got blown out.

Looking horrendous throwing the ball is missing receivers completely and throwing the ball out of reach of even the defender. Which is what Tebow does. Routinely.

Ya. I like what Henne does better. That thing where he throws it within reach of the defender.

Tugboat

Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:08 am Post subject:

I think it's called an interception.

brb. googling.

JaguarCrazy2832

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:59 pm Post subject:

We dont just want a marginal upgrade from Blaine though, we need a real QB
_________________

BBIB

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 7414

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject:

Jaguarfan wrote:

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

That was good enough for RGIII in his first elimination game in the season finale vs the Cowboys

And generally for a traditional passer being at or below 50% would not be effective, but none of those traditional passers can pick up 1st downs with their legs like Tim Tebow

2-4 scrambles a game for a first down can make up an extra 2-4 missed passes per game

Not to mention the potential impact on the overall efficiency of the running game in general

Adrenaline_Flux

Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15124
Location: The Iowa

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:37 pm Post subject:

BBIB wrote:

Jaguarfan wrote:

Completing 50 percent of your passes and throwing for under 200 yards=pretty dang good?
I mean it's a good game for Tebow, but still by no means a good game.

You say that like RGIII played well in that game.
_________________

Sig Credit: ChrisC21325

iPwn

Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35483
Location: Stand United

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:44 pm Post subject:

He has more career rushes than completions. Let that sink in.

And cool, RG3 won a single game playing like that. Let's hope we only get our games scheduled against the Cowboys in elimination games. They are 1-7 in those games, after all.
_________________

samgurl775 wrote:

It's alright iPwn, you're my #1.

EliteTexan80 wrote:

I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!!

JaguarCrazy2832

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject:

iPwn wrote:

Damn

Thats funny Laughing

O wait, he is going to play for us... Mad

_________________

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Jacksonville Jaguars All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Page 9 of 10

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum