| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
backinblack
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 145
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:49 am Post subject: BackinBlack mock |
 |
|
|
First off I had a big mock with lots of pics and descriptions and computer crashed so going with a cheap one now!
We trade our first pick with the Rams sine they are desperate for a LT and have the pics to use to get there. We receive #16, 49 and their first from next year.
at 16 we select Sheldon Richardson
Second rd Margus Hunt de Smu
Third Tank Carridine he will fall with his acl injury and not being able to go to thecombine
4th sanders comming cb georgia
6th best name in the draft Mister Cobble 6 ft 335lb NT
7th Cameron Lawrence ILB
7th Nathan Williams OLB
We use free agency to secure a few lineman and work on the offense but we go strictly defense in the draft.
Rip away lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4174
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
That'd be a great draft IMO.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LivingLegendWFC
Joined: 28 Oct 2009
Posts: 10956
Location: BP On The Geno Sig
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Like it all except the second round pick. Really don't understand what people see in Hunt. There will be better players available there.
_________________
Favorite Prospects - Tank Carradine, Kwame Geathers, Gerald Hodges, Justin Hunter, Luke Joeckel, Barrett Jones, Jarvis Jones, Corey Lemonier, Bacarri Rambo, Sheldon Richardson, Geno Smith, Larry Warford, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12594
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24682
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT.
_________________
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | What do you season your meatballs and sausage with? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12594
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24682
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt. |
That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.
Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT
I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else.
_________________
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | What do you season your meatballs and sausage with? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12594
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt. |
That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.
Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT
I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else. |
yes sir
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oakdb36
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 12760
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt. |
That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.
Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT
I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else. |
This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002.
_________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
macklemore
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 1425
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oakdb36 wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt. |
That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.
Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT
I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else. |
This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002. |
A NT isn't going to make our safeties learn proper angles or how to tackle, A NT won't mask McClain's deficiencies. I don't know why everyone thinks a NT is going to fix our run defense. I mean we run a 4-3 for crying out loud, all a NT is going to do is hurt our pass rush.
today's nfl is centered around the pass, give me the elite penetrating UT and find a run-stuffer later in the draft.
_________________
Last edited by macklemore on Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12594
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| macklemore wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt. |
That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.
Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT
I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else. |
This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002. |
A NT isn't going to make our safeties learn proper angles or how to tackle, A NT won't mask McClain's deficiencies. I don't know why everyone thinks a NT is going to fix our run defense. I mean we run a 4-3 for crying out loud, all a NT is going to do is hurt our pass rush. |
lol what pass rush
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
macklemore
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 1425
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | lol what pass rush |
exactly why need a penetrating UT.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TiberiusRising
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 5580
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| macklemore wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho |
Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT. |
yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt. |
That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.
Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT
I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else. |
This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002. |
A NT isn't going to make our safeties learn proper angles or how to tackle, A NT won't mask McClain's deficiencies. I don't know why everyone thinks a NT is going to fix our run defense. I mean we run a 4-3 for crying out loud, all a NT is going to do is hurt our pass rush.
today's nfl is centered around the pass, give me the elite penetrating UT and find a run-stuffer later in the draft. |
I agree that a true NT is not a huge need and wont solve the issues. We can just look at the last few weeks as proof. Now that position can help but not an instant fix. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12594
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| macklemore wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | lol what pass rush |
exactly why need a penetrating UT. |
so what are tko, big rich, bryant and houston?
we need a burner edge rusher reallllllly bad
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 7076
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd rather take Dion Jordan at 16 and then Jesse Williams or Kawann Short with our second round pick.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
