Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

BackinBlack mock
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
macklemore


Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 1425
Location: Seattle, WA
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
lol what pass rush


exactly why need a penetrating UT.


so what are tko, big rich, bryant and houston?

we need a burner edge rusher reallllllly bad


TKO = knucklehead who is most likely released because of salary
Seymour = FA
Bryant = FA, but nice up and coming player
Houston = 280 pound LE

we do need an edge rusher but we could also use an interior rusher.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
backinblack


Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 148
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
lol what pass rush


exactly why need a penetrating UT.


so what are tko, big rich, bryant and houston?

we need a burner edge rusher reallllllly bad


TKO = knucklehead who is most likely released because of salary
Seymour = FA
Bryant = FA, but nice up and coming player
Houston = 280 pound LE

we do need an edge rusher but we could also use an interior rusher.


we are losing both Kelly and sey IMO so replace them with a younger guy in richardson who in my opinion is great value at pick 16. if you look at the mock again in the 6th round i have us taking Mister Cobble who is 6ft 330 and strong. his specialty is run defense and eating up 2 blocks. put richardson or bryant next to them in 1 on 1 and its win win
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
backinblack


Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 148
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LivingLegendWFC wrote:
Like it all except the second round pick. Really don't understand what people see in Hunt. There will be better players available there.

there might be better players available there but none of them have the ceiling that Hunt has. he is 6ft 8in 280lbs runs in the 4.6's did 35reps at 225 last year with a 82inch wingspan. rumor is he will put up over 40 reps this year and has a 36 inch vertcle leap. in the first half of the bowl game game he had three tackles for loss, two sacks, forced two fumbles and got a safety. hes only played football for 4 years. hes raw but loves the game and plays hard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXIV8LYURsc


Last edited by backinblack on Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 14834
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

backinblack wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
lol what pass rush


exactly why need a penetrating UT.


so what are tko, big rich, bryant and houston?

we need a burner edge rusher reallllllly bad


TKO = knucklehead who is most likely released because of salary
Seymour = FA
Bryant = FA, but nice up and coming player
Houston = 280 pound LE

we do need an edge rusher but we could also use an interior rusher.


we are losing both Kelly and sey IMO so replace them with a younger guy in richardson who in my opinion is great value at pick 16. if you look at the mock again in the 6th round i have us taking Mister Cobble who is 6ft 330 and strong. his specialty is run defense and eating up 2 blocks. put richardson or bryant next to them in 1 on 1 and its win win


i like the draft just not richardson. Id rather go OT/OG. Im big on cobble
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN > all of you


Raider X wrote:
This is football, not pussology 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BNich0622


Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1636
Location: Connecticut
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCOUGHMAN wrote:


i like the draft just not richardson. Id rather go OT/OG. Im big on cobble[/quote]

Who would you take in that slot instead?
_________________

Thanks to RaiderX for the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
backinblack


Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 148
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
backinblack wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
lol what pass rush


exactly why need a penetrating UT.


so what are tko, big rich, bryant and houston?

we need a burner edge rusher reallllllly bad


TKO = knucklehead who is most likely released because of salary
Seymour = FA
Bryant = FA, but nice up and coming player
Houston = 280 pound LE

we do need an edge rusher but we could also use an interior rusher.


we are losing both Kelly and sey IMO so replace them with a younger guy in richardson who in my opinion is great value at pick 16. if you look at the mock again in the 6th round i have us taking Mister Cobble who is 6ft 330 and strong. his specialty is run defense and eating up 2 blocks. put richardson or bryant next to them in 1 on 1 and its win win


i like the draft just not richardson. Id rather go OT/OG. Im big on cobble

the more i watch Cobble the more i like him. he is stout and doesnt get pushed around. commands 2 blockers and stuffs the run. we havent had a guy since big Ted or Sam who was there to clog the middle and let other come cleanly to make the tackle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
backinblack


Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 148
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
macklemore wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
lol what pass rush


exactly why need a penetrating UT.


so what are tko, big rich, bryant and houston?

we need a burner edge rusher reallllllly bad


TKO = knucklehead who is most likely released because of salary
Seymour = FA
Bryant = FA, but nice up and coming player
Houston = 280 pound LE

we do need an edge rusher but we could also use an interior rusher.


i agree richardson would help the middle and Hunt and Tank when fully healthy would help the outside rush.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 14834
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BNich0622 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:


i like the draft just not richardson. Id rather go OT/OG. Im big on cobble


Who would you take in that slot instead?[/quote]

jake matt
warmack
barrett jones
jon cooper - og - tarhells
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN > all of you


Raider X wrote:
This is football, not pussology 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigD1123


Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 308
Location: South carolina
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems well thought out and brings in starters or at least decent back ups with every pick. This team won't be really good for a year or two. But if we could get a draft or two like this one we could compete. Also I may be crazy but I'd love me some Marcus Lattimore and some honey badger late!!! Bring one or both of them in somehow and I'm getting drunk on Mt. Dew and barking at the moon!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Silver&Black88


Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 33067
Location: Boston, MA
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd go Matthews at 16, no problem. Same with Warmack.
_________________

BigBillsFan13 wrote:
Silver&Black88 wrote:
Somewhere, RR strokes his mustache with pride
Among other things...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group