Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Ed Reed vs Randy Moss: Who would you like to see get a ring?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who would you rather see get a ring (Regardless of what team you want to win)
Ed Reed
52%
 52%  [ 98 ]
Randy Moss
47%
 47%  [ 89 ]
Total Votes : 187

Author Message
eagles101


Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 9203
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dtbrehm wrote:
The amount of misconceptions on here regarding Moss is astonishing.


i assume that you know randy moss on a personal level and played with him at some point...because thats the only way to really know what is a misconception or not.
_________________
vikingsvikings wrote:

I don't understand most of that, but I can tell it's probably inaccurate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thanatos


Joined: 01 Jan 2013
Posts: 476
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Randy Moss. He did so much as a Viking that I really hope retires with a Super Bowl ring. He was easily my favorite player growing up and I'd like to see him be able to ride off into the sunset as a champion.
_________________
Quote:
I'm a Vikings fan, that must naturally mean that I'm a masochist, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kmvoss


Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2223
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dtbrehm wrote:
The amount of misconceptions on here regarding Moss is astonishing.


I'm dying for an elucidation on the man. Fill us in on the real story, bro!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SnA ExclusiVe


Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 29663
Location: Spokane, WA
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dtbrehm wrote:
The amount of misconceptions on here regarding Moss is astonishing.


I agree. I mean everyone in this forum thinks we're talking about this Randy Moss:



When really we are all talking about THIS Randy Moss:



I've never seen this Randy Moss quit on his team before, or complain that the catering tastes "like dog sh**!" or anything like that. Seriously, the bad rap this guy gets is INCREDIBLE!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
popie70


Joined: 18 Dec 2010
Posts: 1064
Location: Denver, CO
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we are excluding the team I went with Reed. But that is hard to balance because I really dislike Ray Lewis and his overblown motivational tactics
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spartan300


Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Posts: 639
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate to say this as a Bengals fan but I would like to see Ed Reed get a ring. I have a ton of respect for him and love watching him play. Also, like other Browns and Steeler fans have already mentioned in here, hopefully he wins and retires with Ray.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nzd07


Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 2823
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaTechRavens


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 17743
Location: Madison, WI
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nzd07


Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 2823
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.


Yes it is because he literally walked off the field one time a long time ago... when the vikings had a very, very, very little chance of winning.

I know you'll probably try to spin it as "he still quit" but to be honest It doesn't bother me as much as it does to others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaTechRavens


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 17743
Location: Madison, WI
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.


Yes it is because he literally walked off the field one time a long time ago... when the vikings had a very, very, very little chance of winning.

I know you'll probably try to spin it as "he still quit" but to be honest It doesn't bother me as much as it does to others.


How often did he "figuratively" quit?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nzd07


Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 2823
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.


Yes it is because he literally walked off the field one time a long time ago... when the vikings had a very, very, very little chance of winning.

I know you'll probably try to spin it as "he still quit" but to be honest It doesn't bother me as much as it does to others.


How often did he "figuratively" quit?


Not sure, you tell me. How often did he burn a db for a score? ... well he has 78 40+ receptions, and 226 20+ receptions. Any stats on how many times he "figuratively quit"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaTechRavens


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 17743
Location: Madison, WI
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.


Yes it is because he literally walked off the field one time a long time ago... when the vikings had a very, very, very little chance of winning.

I know you'll probably try to spin it as "he still quit" but to be honest It doesn't bother me as much as it does to others.


How often did he "figuratively" quit?


Not sure, you tell me. How often did he burn a db for a score? ... well he has 78 40+ receptions, and 226 20+ receptions. Any stats on how many times he "figuratively quit"?


I'd say a good portion of several seasons. He either quit or he magically started to suck, and either way it doesn't reflect well on him.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nzd07


Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 2823
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.


Yes it is because he literally walked off the field one time a long time ago... when the vikings had a very, very, very little chance of winning.

I know you'll probably try to spin it as "he still quit" but to be honest It doesn't bother me as much as it does to others.


How often did he "figuratively" quit?


Not sure, you tell me. How often did he burn a db for a score? ... well he has 78 40+ receptions, and 226 20+ receptions. Any stats on how many times he "figuratively quit"?


I'd say a good portion of several seasons. He either quit or he magically started to suck, and either way it doesn't reflect well on him.


Care to give some examples?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaTechRavens


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 17743
Location: Madison, WI
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
Nzd07 wrote:
The only time he literally "quit" on his team was the Redskin game.

Moss is a sore loser, and that's really all there is to it. Some people don't like that, some people (like me) couldn't care less because the guys a beast and never hurt any of the teams he played on.


If you have to use "literally" to make it look better, it's not looking better.


Yes it is because he literally walked off the field one time a long time ago... when the vikings had a very, very, very little chance of winning.

I know you'll probably try to spin it as "he still quit" but to be honest It doesn't bother me as much as it does to others.


How often did he "figuratively" quit?


Not sure, you tell me. How often did he burn a db for a score? ... well he has 78 40+ receptions, and 226 20+ receptions. Any stats on how many times he "figuratively quit"?


I'd say a good portion of several seasons. He either quit or he magically started to suck, and either way it doesn't reflect well on him.


Care to give some examples?


I'd say it defined his tenure with two teams, three if we're counting second stints with the same one.

And if he didn't "quit", at the very least he was such a cancer that teams felt obligated to get rid of him, so that doesn't make him any better.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nzd07


Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 2823
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right because you know the GMs of all those teams and those were the only reasons they got rid of him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 8 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group