DEE RAWL's MOCK DRAFT 3.0 ***UPDATED*** 3/20

BengalsEra · Joined: 31 Dec 2012 Posts: 350

[quote="ochocinco4pres"][quote="Jason_Bengal_Fl"]Bernard at 21 is a reach, and the Bengals don't need a back enough to TAKE one in 1, let alone reach for one.[/quote]

Agreed. Give us Ogletree there[/quote]

you dont want a project in the 1st round.

candyman93 · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:06 pm Post subject:

Matt Barkley would be a TERRIBLE pick for he Browns
_________________

Xero · Joined: 24 Dec 2012 Posts: 185

Good enough for me.

FalconFan13 · Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 8601

Very possible pick but one i for sure hope doesn't happen. Falcons by no means should take a TE in the 1st round this year. The best spot for a TE in this draft is the 2nd to 4th rounds where the talent is almost as good as eifert and Ertz for much better value.

Allowing us to look at the D-line in the 1st round where the talent level is much better than at TE.
_________________

2010 and 2013

oldman9er · Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 36648 Location: New Orleans

DEE RAWL · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:24 pm Post subject:

Let me address some of the comments to your team selections.

Falcons- You guys need DL yes absolutely, however this draft class has far more good DL depth than TE. Your guys' offense is so powerful because they cannot double or key on any of your big 3 and losing Tony or an effective TE threat would hurt more than you might think. Eifert would make your offense even scarier. I feel ultimately he will be seriously considered there.

49ers- You have Davis and Walker yes, but as your fellow fan has stated... The latter is a FA and Ertz is a stanford guy who is a decent blocker and a better overall receiving threat than Walker believe it or not. You guys don't really have any "Needs" and that is a luxury that no other team has, take advantage of it.

Browns/Bills/Cards/Any other team with QB selections- Let me start with a question... Why is it that Geno Smith is acceptable to be a top ten selection, but all the others are not? Remember Matt Barkley was a sure fire top pick a year ago and just because his team had a lack of success then he should sink with them? Nothing about him as a QB has changed, furthermore Geno Smith's team did just as poorely so why does he get the golden pass? With all you saying wait til the 2nd round... I assure you that you will be disappointed because I gaurentee you there will be multiple QBs taken in the top ten, not 1.. and not 2.. Multiple. Browns fans, hows Brandon Wheedon working out for you? Bills- Fitz? Cards... no question needed. Like I said, after the combine and private workouts and such... All the quarterbacks will show worthy of a top ten selection for QB needy teams. Its not a great year, but you can't wait around.

Bengals- You guys could very well go safety, LB or DL... BUT, sources say that your FO is targeting a true playmaker/difference maker at RB. The only one in FA that MIGHT fit that mold would be Reggie Bush. You say you want Te'o or Ogeltree, but both are projects in their own ways. there will be some LBs in the 2nd and 3rd that are not much worse. i.e. Greene/Riddick/Porter/Minter etc & safeties Jefferson/McDonald/Phillips etc
_________________

Nobody · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:39 pm Post subject:

NO to fatass Jenkins.
_________________

Joe_is_the_best on the awesome sig!

DEE RAWL · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:43 pm Post subject:

Marky · Joined: 08 Jan 2007 Posts: 2312

The reason Barkley is a bad pick for the browns is because he doesn't fit our offense. We run a vertical offense for big armed QB's, and Barkley has a weak arm. Weeden is suited perfectly for it.

If you HAVE to give us a QB, give us a big armed QB.
_________________

XBL-theUrbanator69
Student @ smww.com
Twitter: @draft4mark

theindianstud12 · Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Posts: 1807 Location: Chicago

Perfect Bears pick

1BackInBlackFan · Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:27 am Post subject:

With the safety position having good depth in this draft I'm not in favor of drafting one in the first round like I was in the beginning of the season. I feel they could get a real solid one in the ensuing rounds.
_________________

The cool high-flying Troy sig courtesy of Lysar529. Great work!

1BackInBlackFan · Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:27 am Post subject:

With the safety position having good depth in this draft I'm not in favor of drafting one in the first round like I was in the beginning of the season. I feel they could get a real solid one in the ensuing rounds.
_________________

The cool high-flying Troy sig courtesy of Lysar529. Great work!

CleBrowns07 · Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 4196 Location: Willoughby

No way are we taking Barkley at 6. Not happenin'. I have a good feeling Barkley is not going to break the trend of USC QB's playing poorly in the NFL. If we were forced to go QB in round 1, I'd probably take 3 or 4 other guys over him.
_________________

I_GET_SAX · Joined: 17 Nov 2012 Posts: 916 Location: Concord,NH

Filled a hole for NE with a great Safety from the SEC so great job. WR,DT/DE moving forward please...
_________________

Justo on the Sig. Thanks bro