| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
duanegarrison09
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Posts: 633
Location: Macomb County, Michigan
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:08 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Would be interesting losing every game 44 - 50.....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
duanegarrison09
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Posts: 633
Location: Macomb County, Michigan
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Lions in 2012 rankings were;
Offense was 17th at 23.2 points per game. Baltimore is ranked number ten at 24.9 points per game. San Francisco is ranked 11 at 24.8 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the offensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an addition two points.
Defense was 27th at 27.3 points per game. Baltimore is ranked 12 at 21.5 points per game. San Francisco is ranked number two at 17.1 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the defensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an additional touchdown to a touchdown and a half.
If these idiots draft mostly offense         |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
duanegarrison09
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Posts: 633
Location: Macomb County, Michigan
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Draft suggestion;
1. DE - Bjoern/Moore or trade down for Ansah.
2. CB or FS - CB - Desmond Trufont or FS - Vaccaro/Phillip Thomas.
3. RG - Larry Warford or RT - Dallas Thomas or CB/KR - Robert Alford
4. Comp - WLB - Zaviar Gooden/Sio Moore or WR - Chris Harper.
5. RB - Jonathan Franklin or Kenjon Barner or CB - Dwayne Gratz.
6. Punter
7. Who cares.......... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sllim Pickens
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 18702
Location: Middle of the Mitten
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| duanegarrison09 wrote: | Lions in 2012 rankings were;
Offense was 17th at 23.2 points per game. Baltimore is ranked number ten at 24.9 points per game. San Francisco is ranked 11 at 24.8 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the offensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an addition two points.
Defense was 27th at 27.3 points per game. Baltimore is ranked 12 at 21.5 points per game. San Francisco is ranked number two at 17.1 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the defensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an additional touchdown to a touchdown and a half.
If these idiots draft mostly offense |
Well neither of the Super Bowl teams are built on offense, but others have. Also, both have great offensive lines and can run the ball, which eats up clock, which gets first downs and keeps the defense off the field. We have a lot invested into our offense and we could more easily move that offense ranking into the top 5. The defense will improve as well if they don't have to be on the field as much. We lost three or four games on final drives because we couldn't run for a first down and the other team scored a TD. That wouldn't happen with a better interior line.
_________________
Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Whiffleballtony
Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 960
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I think it would be more ideal if we could upgrade from Cherilus into Andre Smith. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sllim Pickens
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 18702
Location: Middle of the Mitten
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Whiffleballtony wrote: | | I think it would be more ideal if we could upgrade from Cherilus into Andre Smith. |
I don't think that's much of an upgrade. Maybe in the run game but is a downgrade in pass protection.
_________________
Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
duanegarrison09
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Posts: 633
Location: Macomb County, Michigan
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sllim Pickens wrote: | | duanegarrison09 wrote: | Lions in 2012 rankings were;
Offense was 17th at 23.2 points per game. Baltimore is ranked number ten at 24.9 points per game. San Francisco is ranked 11 at 24.8 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the offensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an addition two points.
Defense was 27th at 27.3 points per game. Baltimore is ranked 12 at 21.5 points per game. San Francisco is ranked number two at 17.1 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the defensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an additional touchdown to a touchdown and a half.
If these idiots draft mostly offense |
Well neither of the Super Bowl teams are built on offense, but others have. Also, both have great offensive lines and can run the ball, which eats up clock, which gets first downs and keeps the defense off the field. We have a lot invested into our offense and we could more easily move that offense ranking into the top 5. The defense will improve as well if they don't have to be on the field as much. We lost three or four games on final drives because we couldn't run for a first down and the other team scored a TD. That wouldn't happen with a better interior line. |
Slim, I guarantee that if we draft Warmack and Jones in the first two rounds, our defensive will fall further down.
Would you trade San Francisco's entire team for ours? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sllim Pickens
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 18702
Location: Middle of the Mitten
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| duanegarrison09 wrote: | | Sllim Pickens wrote: | | duanegarrison09 wrote: | Lions in 2012 rankings were;
Offense was 17th at 23.2 points per game. Baltimore is ranked number ten at 24.9 points per game. San Francisco is ranked 11 at 24.8 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the offensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an addition two points.
Defense was 27th at 27.3 points per game. Baltimore is ranked 12 at 21.5 points per game. San Francisco is ranked number two at 17.1 points per game. In order for the Lions to match the defensive numbers of the Superbowl teams would require an additional touchdown to a touchdown and a half.
If these idiots draft mostly offense |
Well neither of the Super Bowl teams are built on offense, but others have. Also, both have great offensive lines and can run the ball, which eats up clock, which gets first downs and keeps the defense off the field. We have a lot invested into our offense and we could more easily move that offense ranking into the top 5. The defense will improve as well if they don't have to be on the field as much. We lost three or four games on final drives because we couldn't run for a first down and the other team scored a TD. That wouldn't happen with a better interior line. |
Slim, I guarantee that if we draft Warmack and Jones in the first two rounds, our defensive will fall further down.
Would you trade San Francisco's entire team for ours? |
Yeah, but we can't do that. I would also trade for New England or Atlanta who were offensive centered teams. If we improve our run game and ability to control the clock, have less three and outs, improve the field position..... Our defensive statistics would improve as would our record.
_________________
Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TL-TwoWinsAway
Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 25671
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ahoda wrote: | | Anyone think they could let Gosder leave via FA and resign Fox to play RT and keep the draft the same? |
... when has Fox shown, at any point, that he could be anything close to what Gosder is right now?
_________________
Team Stylish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nnivolcm
Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 7449
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TL-TwoWinsAway wrote: | | ahoda wrote: | | Anyone think they could let Gosder leave via FA and resign Fox to play RT and keep the draft the same? |
... when has Fox shown, at any point, that he could be anything close to what Gosder is right now? |
When has he had the opportunity to show that? However backups become starters all the time in the NFL with limited exposure.
_________________
| George Carlin wrote: | | Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. |
Team Stylish
Thanks to IDOG for the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LionsFan630
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 11254
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Or possibly Goz leaves and Rieff takes over RT with the Lions drafting Joeckel or Fisher to man LT?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
YlionsY
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 14656
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ahoda wrote: | | Anyone think they could let Gosder leave via FA and resign Fox to play RT and keep the draft the same? |
I wouldn't be opposed to this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
YlionsY
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 14656
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LionsFan630 wrote: | | Or possibly Goz leaves and Rieff takes over RT with the Lions drafting Joeckel or Fisher to man LT? |
I'd rather stick with Reiff at LT and work on getting a quality G and C |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TL-TwoWinsAway
Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 25671
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nnivolcm wrote: | | TL-TwoWinsAway wrote: | | ahoda wrote: | | Anyone think they could let Gosder leave via FA and resign Fox to play RT and keep the draft the same? |
... when has Fox shown, at any point, that he could be anything close to what Gosder is right now? |
When has he had the opportunity to show that? However backups become starters all the time in the NFL with limited exposure. |
When has he had the opportunity? Well, he was drafted in 2010. He couldn't stay healthy, and wasn't a threat to take snaps during the rare stretches that he was healthy.
Gosder, on the other hand, has emerged as a pretty good player at the position.
I have no idea why many think that Fox can step in and be a pretty good player... it's just not that easy, nor is it likely. Doing this would be a significant mistake.
_________________
Team Stylish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sllim Pickens
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 18702
Location: Middle of the Mitten
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TL-TwoWinsAway wrote: | | Nnivolcm wrote: | | TL-TwoWinsAway wrote: | | ahoda wrote: | | Anyone think they could let Gosder leave via FA and resign Fox to play RT and keep the draft the same? |
... when has Fox shown, at any point, that he could be anything close to what Gosder is right now? |
When has he had the opportunity to show that? However backups become starters all the time in the NFL with limited exposure. |
When has he had the opportunity? Well, he was drafted in 2010. He couldn't stay healthy, and wasn't a threat to take snaps during the rare stretches that he was healthy.
Gosder, on the other hand, has emerged as a pretty good player at the position.
I have no idea why many think that Fox can step in and be a pretty good player... it's just not that easy, nor is it likely. Doing this would be a significant mistake. |
I agree. Fox may well have that ability and I would love to know, but if he was better than or even close to as good as Goz, I am assuming he would have gotten some snaps. I liked the draft pick, and would be ok with giving him a shot to win the RT spot, but I would not be comfortable planning on him being our RT.
_________________
Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
