| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31576
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chris00cm wrote: | | They wont add Lewis. Peterman`s salary is the big concern about this trade. Its up to you guys if you`d rather have the S\G depth or DE depth. |
My answer would be no. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chris00cm 
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 Posts: 16229 Location: St. Charles, Missouri
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | chris00cm wrote: | | They wont add Lewis. Peterman`s salary is the big concern about this trade. Its up to you guys if you`d rather have the S\G depth or DE depth. |
My answer would be no. | Agree. We can easily replace Peterman in free agency. Isnt worth the 2+ mil investment. _________________
Xbox Live Gamertag: Chris Sanity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonezy 
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Posts: 2993
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | Why are we trading our Long Snapper?
We kind of need that guy.
I still don't think Stephen Peterman is worth trading for. He's not a good player and he's a career RG. So we're trading for an expensive backup RG? Pass.
As for HBs, I'm never really in favor of trading much compensation for them. Just too many good ones out there.
Finally, Taylor Mays? 0 interest at all. Zimmer is known as a guy that saves careers of busts and even he can't save Mays's career. Never liked Mays as a prospect though. |
Especially when Detroit has a pro bowl LS lmao _________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjab360 
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 3366 Location: On Top
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | jjab360 wrote: | | chris00cm wrote: | | Dont like Smith or Tate. Converting ZBS guys to PBS always scares me. |
As offensive coordinator, I think we'll be seeing a lot more ZBS looks next year, assuming Sj doesn't return. Fits Pead's and Richardson's playing styles much better and gives us the flexibility of a quicker, more agile line allowing for better pass blocking. In fact, I'm pretty sure the only big gains Richardson had last year came out of a ZBS look and that's all Pead ever worked with in Cincy. |
What about Ganaway ?  | He actually plays like a much smaller back than he is. That being said we don't have anything invested in him nor has he shown much of anything to believe in, so I doubt he should have any impact on offseason plans. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonezy 
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Posts: 2993
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jjab360 wrote: | | Jonezy wrote: | | jjab360 wrote: | | chris00cm wrote: | | Dont like Smith or Tate. Converting ZBS guys to PBS always scares me. |
As offensive coordinator, I think we'll be seeing a lot more ZBS looks next year, assuming Sj doesn't return. Fits Pead's and Richardson's playing styles much better and gives us the flexibility of a quicker, more agile line allowing for better pass blocking. In fact, I'm pretty sure the only big gains Richardson had last year came out of a ZBS look and that's all Pead ever worked with in Cincy. |
What about Ganaway ?  | He actually plays like a much smaller back than he is. That being said we don't have anything invested in him nor has he shown much of anything to believe in, so I doubt he should have any impact on offseason plans. |
What him as a Fullback? I have always thought he could a Marcell Reese type aspect to the position for us _________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The J.R.S. 
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 2777 Location: Next to Waldo
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chris00cm wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | chris00cm wrote: | | They wont add Lewis. Peterman`s salary is the big concern about this trade. Its up to you guys if you`d rather have the S\G depth or DE depth. |
My answer would be no. | Agree. We can easily replace Peterman in free agency. Isnt worth the 2+ mil investment. |
Consensus reached. _________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31576
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Honestly guys, I'd avoid player trades unless a team is desperate to get rid of him and willing to sell low. Otherwise, we're not going to get good value. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The J.R.S. 
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 2777 Location: Next to Waldo
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | Honestly guys, I'd avoid player trades unless a team is desperate to get rid of him and willing to sell low. Otherwise, we're not going to get good value. |
That's precisely what I shared with IRams. We'd be better served to save the few trade chips we have for the draft. _________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gambino62 
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 4225 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Honestly guys, I'd avoid player trades unless a team is desperate to get rid of him and willing to sell low. Otherwise, we're not going to get good value. |
That's precisely what I shared with IRams. We'd be better served to save the few trade chips we have for the draft. |
Not to mention, people get more desperate the closer we get to draft time and trade values decrease. Best to wait. _________________
Kempes on the sig, El ramster on the avy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31576
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Gambino62 wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Honestly guys, I'd avoid player trades unless a team is desperate to get rid of him and willing to sell low. Otherwise, we're not going to get good value. |
That's precisely what I shared with IRams. We'd be better served to save the few trade chips we have for the draft. |
Not to mention, people get more desperate the closer we get to draft time and trade values decrease. Best to wait. |
Yep, unless we're blown away by an offer, it's typically best to wait until draft day.
We've done some magical things with trade downs.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iRaMs
Joined: 05 May 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Teletran 1
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | Honestly guys, I'd avoid player trades unless a team is desperate to get rid of him and willing to sell low. Otherwise, we're not going to get good value. |
I agree. _________________ Robert Quinn
23 Tackles 8.5 sacks 1 Fumble |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chris00cm 
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 Posts: 16229 Location: St. Charles, Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If the price was right, how do you guys feel about Danny Watkins, Nate Allen, or Clay Harbor? _________________
Xbox Live Gamertag: Chris Sanity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonezy 
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Posts: 2993
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like Danny Watkins _________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NextBigThing 
Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Posts: 15886 Location: Tuck Rule FTW
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
sorry guys, the 5 team mega deal which had
Rams Get
-Logan Mankins
-Percy Harvin
Rams Lose
-16th overall Pick
has fallen through.  _________________
The King Does As He Pleases
| NFLfan511 wrote: | | NBT, I made an account here just because of you. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31576
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chris00cm wrote: | | If the price was right, how do you guys feel about Danny Watkins, Nate Allen, or Clay Harbor? |
If they're selling low, I'd look into Danny Watkins for sure. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|