| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DawgX
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 9901
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:24 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
It'd be stupid to trade him. The Browns would be lucky to get a third-round pick for him and Jackson is more valuable to the Browns than a third. He was above average in the 3-4 before but rememeber, he had awful talent around him. The Browns had a horrible defensive line in front of Jackson and now the Browns should have a very good defensive line to help occupy blockers. Therefore, Jackson should have room to roam around and thus be a good player.
_________________
Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee
Kiltman on the great sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ditchdigger
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 14032
Location: Columbus, OH
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | FEARtheELF wrote: |  |
Why the rolling eyes? Not valued high enough? |
No, it's because the OP has been formulating ways to replace DQ since forever.
Last year at this time, he stated that Manti Te'o, Vontaze Burfict, Dont'a Hightower and Luke Kuechly were all better than DQ "right now".
If the eyeroll is for this pathetic vandetta spilling into this forum, then I fully endorse it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CornOnDaCobb
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 246
Location: Tampa, FL
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nick barnett couldnt efven get traded when we had bishop replace him, we cut him and got nothing out of him, id say nothing more than a 5th for DQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
