| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
La_Vader 
Joined: 04 Jan 2013 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:55 pm Post subject: How many new starters do you think we need? |
|
|
|
Here is how many starters I believe we will need, assuming we are running a 4-3
RT, LG, TE, DT, MLB, CB, CB
Palmer- brought back one more year
McFadden- brought back one more year
Reece
Moore, DHB
? (Myers)- think he walks
Valdheer
?LG
Wiz
Brisel
?RT
Defense
Houston
Shaugnessy or Carter
Bryant
? DT
Burris
Wheeler
MLB ?
CB
Adams
Huff
Branch _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chali21 
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 1709 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
La_Vader 
Joined: 04 Jan 2013 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
ouch. You a fan? What about my boy Marcel Reece? where's the love _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bone_Collector 
Joined: 23 Jan 2013 Posts: 251 Location: So. Cal
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think you should add DE. We definitely need an upgrade there. IMO, the positions we absolutely have to upgrade are DE, NT, and RT. _________________
Props to JTagg7754 for the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
early43
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 984
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
1) Pass Rushing DE
2) DT
3) CB
4) MLB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
101Raider 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 2068
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DT,CB x2, MLB, RG (I expect Briesel getting cut), LG, RT, DE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bo_Spice 
Joined: 17 May 2009 Posts: 7076
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd say we need to find a TE, LG, RG, RT, RDE, NT, MLB, and two CB within the next couple off-seasons.
We desperately need to address our defensive woes in the pass rushing department, secondary, and find a run stuffing nose tackle to put in the middle of our defensive line. We also need to improve the interior of our offensive line and sure up the right tackle spot. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SBXISBXVSBXVIII 
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 907 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
LOL. Beat me to it. _________________
Props JTagg7754 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darbsk 
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 617 Location: Wales, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
QB - Palmer will be fine with a half decent OC, Pryor still learning
RB - DMC, Goodson, Reece will be fine
WR - Could do with a bona fide NR 1 but more a desire than a need
TE - Not 'needed' unless Myers walks in FA
OT - Could do with an upgrade at RT but not urgent
OG - Definately a need, Carlisle will probably retire and Briesel is a ?
OC - Fine
DE - Definately a need at RDE, pass rush helps everything else on D
DT - Bryant and Bilikidi could start but we need depth at least, stout NT type would be desireable but not as urgent as RDE IMO
LB - We need a new MLB and depth, not as high priority as DE or OG IMO
CB - We need one new starter and depth
S - Depth only, i think Huff and Branch are fine for now
IMHO we 'need' a starting caliber RDE, OG, MLB, CB. These should be the priorities, we don't 'need' as such but 'desire' to get RT, DT, LB depth, CB depth, S depth, NR1 WR _________________ “It may take us a short while, but we'll get that nastiness of the Raiders back.”
Mr. Al Davis RIP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Play4Blood 
Joined: 03 Feb 2010 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
You forgot about our punter. _________________
Oakland's new punter. Yes. Punter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DOCLEW 28 
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 10587 Location: East Oakland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't think we need a new starter at TE. Meyers is just fine to me. _________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oak42069
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 2092
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | I don't think we need a new starter at TE. Meyers is just fine to me. |
THIS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
big_palooka 
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 19054 Location: ATL
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Offense:
LG, RG, RT, WR,
Defense:
MLB, DT, DE, CB (2)
You could make a case to replace QB, SS, OLBs _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Play4Blood 
Joined: 03 Feb 2010 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | I don't think we need a new starter at TE. Meyers is just fine to me. |
Awful run blocker.
Offers no RAC.
Not a threat down the seam.
Does his best work against soft zones in garbage time.
Myers is average at best, and "average" might be giving him too much credit.
I'm all for keeping him, but with no intentions of starting him, nor paying him as a starter. If another team is that misguided, let them waste their salary cap on him. _________________
Oakland's new punter. Yes. Punter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Play4Blood 
Joined: 03 Feb 2010 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
New starters:
LG
RG
RT
TE
WR
RE
NT
DT (If Bryant walks)
MLB
SAM (If Wheeler walks)
LCB
RCB
An argument can also be made for QB, FB, and FS. _________________
Oakland's new punter. Yes. Punter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|