| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
deuces22wild
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 5816
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:29 pm Post subject: Danny Amendola |
 |
|
|
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4991/danny-amendola
| Quote: | | Amendola is clearly Sam Bradford's go-to guy and is still just 27 years old, but his inability to sustain health could prevent the Rams from making a pricey long-term commitment. Using the franchise tag on Amendola would put them right up against the salary cap. |
Amendola is a beast when healthy, do you guys think it's 100% he is back with the Rams next season?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StLunatic88
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 7252
Location: How good is your Good?
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:39 pm Post subject: Re: Danny Amendola |
|
|
|
| deuces22wild wrote: | http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4991/danny-amendola
| Quote: | | Amendola is clearly Sam Bradford's go-to guy and is still just 27 years old, but his inability to sustain health could prevent the Rams from making a pricey long-term commitment. Using the franchise tag on Amendola would put them right up against the salary cap. |
Amendola is a beast when healthy, do you guys think it's 100% he is back with the Rams next season? |
A beast? Not really. Healthy or not he is a limited player. A good player, but clearly limited.
And regardless to what lazy publications have been suggesting, the Franchise Tag isnt even an option. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7697
Location: Busch III
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:41 pm Post subject: Re: Danny Amendola |
|
|
|
| deuces22wild wrote: | http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4991/danny-amendola
| Quote: | | Amendola is clearly Sam Bradford's go-to guy and is still just 27 years old, but his inability to sustain health could prevent the Rams from making a pricey long-term commitment. Using the franchise tag on Amendola would put them right up against the salary cap. |
Amendola is a beast when healthy, do you guys think it's 100% he is back with the Rams next season? |
Not even close to 100% sure. I'd say more like 60/40 he's back...
Article hit it on the head. When he's on the field, he's a good option underneath...
He hasn't shown the ability to sustain his health. The FO is gonna be very leery of giving what he'll be looking for; bigger check and multiple years...
_________________
TommyC376 on the sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 3004
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm not going to lie, I'm expecting him NOT to be retained. He will probably want to much money for someone who gets injured to easily. Sam and Pettis are starting to click nicely , I like Pettis myself.
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DerekBrink
Joined: 16 Nov 2012
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't know honestly. If he wants a huge contract than know. We could draft someone like Austin who could replace his production and at half the price. All while probably playing an entire season.
If we spend big money on a WR I hope it's on Bowe or Wallace and not Amendola. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Halradio
Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 4179
Location: Washington
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
When Danny is healthy is as good a slot WR as anyone out there.
The kicker is he has missed time because of injuries so durability has to be a concern. That being said despite missing most of Oct he still led the team in catches and was third in yards.
I see the Rams making an effort to retain him; however, I don't see Snead and company breaking the bank to keep him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7697
Location: Busch III
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | I'm not going to lie, I'm expecting him NOT to be retained. |
Agreed, and I can't fault the FO one bit if he does go...
I really think we'll see the Patriots let Welker walk and Danny getting another shot to play under McDaniels...
_________________
TommyC376 on the sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jjab360
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3368
Location: On Top
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I honestly can't see anybody but us making any kind of investment in a guy who has been injured as often as DA and is limited only to the slot. He is valuable, but only to the Rams, he'll almost certainly be back next year.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deuces22wild
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 5816
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Maybe beast was the wrong word. If he had some strong outside options around him I would expect him to flourish.
What type of money have you guys heard is looking for?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 3004
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| deuces22wild wrote: | Maybe beast was the wrong word. If he had some strong outside options around him I would expect him to flourish.
What type of money have you guys heard is looking for? |
Probably 5-6 a year. I wouldn't pay more then 4
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StLunatic88
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 7252
Location: How good is your Good?
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | deuces22wild wrote: | Maybe beast was the wrong word. If he had some strong outside options around him I would expect him to flourish.
What type of money have you guys heard is looking for? |
Probably 5-6 a year. I wouldn't pay more then 4 |
I wouldnt want to play him any more than $2.5mil per. If you are going to commit years to him The money has to be low.
And to say hes only valuable to the Rams? Thats just wrong. A healthy Slot man of the caliber he can be is valuable to every team that runs any decent amount of 3 WR sets (something I can see alot less of from us next year) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deuces22wild
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 5816
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Interesting, thanks for the responses guys!
Buy the way love, love what you guys are doing on defense 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 3004
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| deuces22wild wrote: | Interesting, thanks for the responses guys!
Buy the way love, love what you guys are doing on defense |
Thank you sir  , likewise
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2867
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | I'm not going to lie, I'm expecting him NOT to be retained. He will probably want to much money for someone who gets injured to easily. Sam and Pettis are starting to click nicely , I like Pettis myself. |
This.
Pettis FTW 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 25921
Location: Sam Bradfords Bed!
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
You guys are selling Amendola short, When he's on the field! Sam Bradfords numbers are damm good. Not to mention he always gets open, Dude is a slot killer.
I'm also not a huge fan of him. I thought he would be replaceable with Salas but I was wrong. Danny Amendola is the truth, Too bad about his injuries though.
4-5 Million would be a steal for Amendola.
_________________
| Dus10 wrote: | | Note to self: Do not lose a sig bet to Rammy. |
| Mossburg wrote: | | Spurs D to Pacers D is feathers to razor blades. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
