Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2012 In Review: Lamarr Houston
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BlackWidow


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 436
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:32 pm    Post subject: 2012 In Review: Lamarr Houston Reply with quote

GREAT read.

http://www.raiders.com/news/article-1/2012-in-Review-Lamarr-Houston/33dabe2b-d389-45a1-8b01-aedc451a660f
_________________
RIP Layne Staley. Your wings are no longer denied.



[quote="RaidersAreOne"]BlackWidow is a chick? Everything makes so much more sense all of a sudden.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raiders4sho!


Joined: 21 Jan 2009
Posts: 1801
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good read. I hope we can get a good de and move him to 3 tech. He'd be a monster inside
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 14917
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dam a team high 4.5 sacks Laughing we suck
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN > all of you


Raider X wrote:
This is football, not pussology 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BlackWidow


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 436
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Y'all see the video on there too?
_________________
RIP Layne Staley. Your wings are no longer denied.



[quote="RaidersAreOne"]BlackWidow is a chick? Everything makes so much more sense all of a sudden.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BlackWidow


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 436
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raiders4sho! wrote:
Good read. I hope we can get a good de and move him to 3 tech. He'd be a monster inside


Don't laugh but what does that mean?
_________________
RIP Layne Staley. Your wings are no longer denied.



[quote="RaidersAreOne"]BlackWidow is a chick? Everything makes so much more sense all of a sudden.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10894
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It means he wants them to move Houston unside to DT so he can play between the guard and tackle on the outside shade of the guard. I don't know why people always bring that up when Bryant does a good job there and there are a ton of DT's coming out this year. Especially when Houston had his best year as a pro at DE. Just makes no sense.
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BlackWidow


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 436
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ohhh ok thank you Smile
_________________
RIP Layne Staley. Your wings are no longer denied.



[quote="RaidersAreOne"]BlackWidow is a chick? Everything makes so much more sense all of a sudden.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
macklemore


Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 1425
Location: Seattle, WA
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DOCLEW 28 wrote:
Especially when Houston had his best year as a pro at DE. Just makes no sense.


he has been playing DE his whole career.

I think he would be better off as a DE in a 3-4, tho.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10894
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duh. I know that. I meant he had his best season so why move him. And he is too much of a pass rush type big DE for the 34. He wants to get to the passer instead of occupying blockers.
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TiberiusRising


Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 8898
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

With a good pass rusher on the other side and someone occupying blocks in the middle I could easily see Houston getting double digit sacks next year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rolni


Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 2547
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would leave him at LDE.

But if Bryant leaves and Shaggy stays cheap we could push him inside with Shaggy at LDE.

Either way we need a true pass rusher at RDE and a NT.
_________________
WIN LOSE OR TIE...RAIDER FAN 'TIL I DIE!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oakdb36


Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 14286
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DOCLEW 28 wrote:
Duh. I know that. I meant he had his best season so why move him. And he is too much of a pass rush type big DE for the 34. He wants to get to the passer instead of occupying blockers.


Justin Smith? JJ.Watt?
_________________
Plush wrote:
Papa was a trolling stone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jimkelly02


Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 117
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know its just Profootballfocus.com's stats but....

Houston:
877 snaps

14 QB hits, #4 for DEs
35 QB hurries, #15
#27 pass rushing 4-3 DE

#2 run 4-3DE in run defense
#3 in stops with 40: "solo tackles which constitute a failure by offensive player"... I think that's like shedding the block or shooting a gap and making a play versus running a guy down from behind


btw Shaughnessy's stats for comparison:
688 snaps

5 QB hits, #40 for DEs
5 QB hurries, #61 for DEs
#59 pass rushing 4-3 DE
#11 run 4-3DE in run defense
#30 in stops with 23: "solo tackles which constitute a failure by offensive player"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Play4Blood


Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 129
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BlackWidow wrote:
Raiders4sho! wrote:
Good read. I hope we can get a good de and move him to 3 tech. He'd be a monster inside


Don't laugh but what does that mean?


The Warren Sapp position.
_________________

Oakland's new punter. Yes. Punter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raiders4sho!


Joined: 21 Jan 2009
Posts: 1801
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BlackWidow wrote:
Raiders4sho! wrote:
Good read. I hope we can get a good de and move him to 3 tech. He'd be a monster inside


Don't laugh but what does that mean?


It's normally called UT here it is the outside shade of the guard. And the reason I say that is that it looks like it'd be a natural fit for his build. We should put players in their best position to succeed. We'd get good rotation of the DL and there's nothing wrong with getting a pass rush from the inside
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group