does this mean we have no intrest in jamie sharper.......

goviks26 · Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Posts: 79

now that we traded for a mlb does this mean no more intrest in jamie i would love to see jamie in purple next year with his brother but now it doesent loo likely so what do you guys think
_________________
thank u game cocks for troy williamson

andrew91 · Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:40 pm Post subject:

Yes. Yes it does. We dont need a baker of sharpers caliber now. Our linebacking core is set now, so now we can draft a receiver at 7 and a safety at 18.
_________________

Helter · Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 8550 Location: Delaware

probably not

vike daddy · Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66830

andrew, would you take merriman if he was there at #7?

common cents · Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 1862 Location: Minneapolis, MN

i'm not andrew but i would take merriman in a split second...

as of this moment i dont really know who i like more merriman or dj...

vike daddy · Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66830

i know what you mean, cents, some things change almost hourly.

dj is impressive, but merriman would be more versatile.

andrew91 · Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:48 pm Post subject:

Fartman · Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 2331

We need Mike Williams. F Sharper.

vike daddy · Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66830

yeah, i've wanted to move bennett for boldin for some time now. find out what the cards want and see if it's doable, i say.

BigRich3113 · Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 1861

I say draft Mike Williams and Thomas davis........ but oif both WR are gone at #7 pick and marriman is there wi ould gladyly take him........he could play either DE or LB and i don't even know which one i'd like him better at Very Happy

common cents · Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 1862 Location: Minneapolis, MN

i cant wait till we draft merriman...

4-3 base d/running downs...olb, he'd be a beast with his size and closing speed rb's would fear going to his side...

nickel/dime...de, he'd be a beast with his size and closing speed qb's would fear dropping back to pass...

vike daddy · Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66830

yeah, i think you're right. he has more versatility than dj might have. and you know, if you can become a better player than dj is right now, man are you good!

parcells loves merriman too, that should mean something.

andrew91 · Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:45 am Post subject:

Parcells can go f himself cause he doesnt have a top ten pick.
But like I said in my thread, we can go a bunch of ways with this pick
_________________

vike daddy · Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66830

tice and company better work out all the permutations in advance or they'll take too much time on the clock and lose a pick.

god, that would be awful.

common cents · Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 1862 Location: Minneapolis, MN

the thing that really sold me on merriman is we got cowart...

dj is the more polished prospect...i firmly believe he's the more nfl ready prospect...

while merriman is just more athletically gifted...not as fast but overall i think hes better suited to make a huge impact on the game...6-3 274, with a 4.57-4.6 40, and a 41.5 vertical...come on thats just ridiculous

seriously lavar arrington got drafted 3rd on pure athletic ability well this kid is putting up better numbers than arrington plus 30 pds.

he might look lost at times as an olb...but in the nickel and dime with one goal goal and one goal only (get to the qb.) thats where he'd make the biggest impact.

i could go on forever...