| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ensman13 
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 1204 Location: Austinburg, OH
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't know..I guess Johnson could be good, but it definitely isn't really a need. In the second, I like Doug Free over Brown, but either is fine with me _________________
| Thomas Jefferson wrote: | | The Declaration of Independence |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HFAStud
Joined: 21 Oct 2006 Posts: 149 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I like your Titans pick, but the dig at Pacman is just stupid. Pacman is already a near-shutdown corner. Just cuz he has had less than nice outside actions doesnt mean he isnt a demon on the field. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JFect
Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 808
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would hate for the browns to pick that early, although it now is highly likely we will. I do love the picks. Calvin Johnson, Braylon Edwards and Winslow on the field. Damn! Then throw Jurevicius in the slot. That is scary.
Levi Brown is also a great pick there. I would love that draft. And since our season is practically over, all i can look forward to is the draft. _________________
Go Browns! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DerrickJohnson#11
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 2666
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
terrible bucs pick we wont go QB in round 1 when we have so many other needs i would be very suprised if we went offense in round 1 unless Joe Thomas or Calvin Johnson are avaliable its time to draft some defense we need some youth on that side of the ball...pick here would be griffin, landry, or moses... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deets 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 12660 Location: Red Sox Nation
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Kazkal wrote: | 1.)Mkristo Bruce -Postion good like his size but first time I think I've even heard him mentioned in rnd 1...
2.)Zach Miller - If Bengaks take a TE this is the TE I want...but hard see em taking a TE with need at WLB,DE and DT.
::TOP TEN FREE AGENTS:::
11.)Daniel Graham too the bengals =) |
lol everyone likes to leave the patriots  _________________ "well, they got X player I wanted but they clearly overpaid" is the battle cry of bitter and ignorant football fans
FF Member #67 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheRealMishemu 
Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 702
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
dont need a RB or a OLB that high, reid doesnt run the ball that much no matter who he has
WE DONT NEED A RB! _________________ Brown: 46 rec, 816 yards, 8 rec TD, 1 rush TD, 15-20+, 6-40+, 34 FD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ToastedOats
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| If that were to happen for the Broncos I would be estatic!! Signing Dwight Freeny and then addressing the 2 biggest needs on the Defense excellent job of doing your homework. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khodder 
 Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 48162 Location: New New York
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
1: Im not sure LD will leave and even if he did he wont go to the texans coz they use the ZBS and Davis will not fit into that ever even if he really wanted to.
2: Don't like the 1st rounder our Lione is [inappropriate/removed] yes yes it is but Denny has always picked BPA at a need and if he continues to do that (if he is the coach) we will take Landry. IMO i would take Gaither there if he declares. he is perfect to play Blindside RT.
3: I really like Rufus Alexander as a player but not as the pick for the cards. there are many better options there namely a FS if we dont get landry in the 1st. Or Kyle Young the C from Fresno. We dont have a C on our team, well not a real one anyway.
Overall nice mock, FA im just curious as to who if anybody you have coming to the cards????? _________________ Patrick Peterson - 92 targets, 40 catches allowed, 602 yards, 6 TD's, 7 INT's
The Big Brain am winning again, I am the Greetest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chri70877
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
you have givin me hope as a broncos fan that we will finnaly have a true de
The first round pick is soild but i could see the broncos taking a bluechip de or offensive player here
I like the 2nd round pick |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RockRaider
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The Raiders will not take an Offensive that high. Robert Gallery although not great is improving and is in only his 3rd year and was the #2 overall pick a few years ago, Al isnt going to give up on him that quickly. The Raiders should grab A. Peterson at that pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
49er4life 
Joined: 11 Mar 2006 Posts: 866 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
the only way we would go offense at that pick is either a) our drafting department is completely stoned, or b) we upgrade our defense through FA. And since you don't have us picking up any of the top 10 FAs i would assume option a) must have happened. I would much rather get Cason in the first, and i like Buster in the second, but if Carriker is there i would find it hard to pass on him. _________________
everyone's doing it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cew28315039 
Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 7817 Location: West Va. U
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
AWSOME ram draft with Poz and Zb _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blknite01 
Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 13695 Location: Apopka, FL
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Not Yelling at you, but I doubt we go after Cato june, he isn't really what we need.
Also Denver can't jump up from 30 to 13. The Picks are more then 290 points apart(on that draft chart)
| Broncos_fan_from_UK wrote: |
more has come out about the trade since then. aparently it is the first trade ever based strictly on draft value points. the trade is for the equivalent of a late 2nd-early 3rd (250-275 points) so if the broncos win the superbowl the highest they could trade up in the 1st is the 20th over all pick. conversly if the broncos get the 22nd pick and the skins get the 19th pick then the trade would be swapping firsts (95 points) and the redskins third (175) for a total of 270 points get it. apparently there are like 994 different scenarios for this thing but the important thing to remember is that the broncos will be reciving a series of draft picks worth 250-275 points on a tradde value chart. |
_________________ Adopt-a-Redskins: Fred Davis!
I'd rather get gunned down than dumb'd down |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cardsfan7
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 5974 Location: Johnson City, NY
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
we would take landry their for the cardinals
and in the second rd we would take Jake long
that would be awesome if it happened that way !
GO CARDS !!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VTViking56
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Not really sure why you have the Vikings picking up Chris Simms. And CB is not a concern right now, Tomlin's defense is still in need of playmaking LB.... secondary is fine. 2nd round pick is great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|