| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Titansfan 
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 7251 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TTitanFAN32 wrote: | | Quote: | | 7 - Tennessee Titans - Dewayne Jarrett - WR - USC |
Bad pick for the Titans.
People don't understand that we don't need a WR. We have a ton of young players for the future on our roster right now. Calvin Johnson would just be to good to pass on and that's why we would take him but other then that I don't think that we will take a WR in the 1st round...
Better picks would be either AP or Gaines Adams..
| Quote: | | 7 - Tennessee Titans - Rufus Alexander - LB - Oklahoma |
Another bad choice.
Our LB position might be solified for the future if Stephen Tulloch pans out for us so that we have him, Bulluck, and Thornton for the future...
Better picks would be Daymeion Hughes, Aaron Rouse, or Darrelle Revis. |
I'm sorry but if you're saying we don't need a Wide Receiver then we won't take Johnson either. However, I don't think we are set at Receiver... I mean we haven't had a one hundrer yard Receiver yet and as good as Jones is doing I still don't think he will be a true number one Receiver. He will be a very good number two Receiver though. It all depends on if Givens does anything this season or not.
I agree with you on the second pick though. _________________
Props to JammerHammer on the awesome sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrpotamus 
Joined: 16 Dec 2005 Posts: 2852 Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Branch would be an infinately better pick than Pitcock for the Bengals in the first round. Decent second round pick. _________________ Tired of having to put down five stacks to get a crispy new ride? Go to IDeserveACar.com to get a fresh new whip. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ToastedOats
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The Bronco pick doesn't make sense unless the kid from Fresno can play safety. The cornerbacks are set with Bailey, Darrent Williams (who is vastly underrated), Dominque Foxworth, and Karl Paymah. The 2nd round pick is good as that meets a need. In the first look either Safety or OT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrettWolfe 
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 5485 Location: Cleveland, OH
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Great first round pick for Miami, but we would draft Long from Michigan than Semadjia(sp?) _________________
Dolphins Fan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 8650 Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I have tweaked the first two rounds based on previous comments, and added in the third round.
Input? _________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elwayfan07
Joined: 13 Nov 2005 Posts: 4857 Location: Pensacola FL
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I cant see Denver ending the season bad enough to be 15 overall. Gaither is way to big for the zone blocking scheme. I like Harrel I don;t know much bout robinson. Gattis would be nice in 3rd round _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 8650 Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| elwayfan07 wrote: | | I cant see Denver ending the season bad enough to be 15 overall. Gaither is way to big for the zone blocking scheme. I like Harrel I don;t know much bout robinson. Gattis would be nice in 3rd round |
Ok, I'm going to ignore the question on the number of the pick. That got very little thought on my part. I see Denver with a QB situation I think may switch and I project them to the middle of the round.
As far as Gaither, there is no such thing as too big for the ZBS, only too stiff/slow. This guy is the next in the line of Maryland athletic freaks. Gaither may be 6'9" 350, but he can run a 4.8 sec 40 yard dash. He is fast and athletic enough to work in the system without sacrificing the size. I understand you use the ZBS and don't traditionally draft OL very high, but it's better to be right than consistent. _________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrownsFan731 
Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 1438
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Give me Okoye in the 3rd instead, and I'll walk away a happy man. _________________
Sig Courteous of ElipticDawg
Love University of Kentucky sports? Check out KentuckyInk.com, ESPN affiliate |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scar988 
 Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 28719 Location: Charleston, SC
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | 16 - Atlanta Falcons - Prescott Burgess - LB - Michigan |
please actually do some research on your picks we have no need for a linebacker at all. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 8650 Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| scar988 wrote: | | Quote: | | 16 - Atlanta Falcons - Prescott Burgess - LB - Michigan |
please actually do some research on your picks we have no need for a linebacker at all. |
Well, as I looked through it, it looked like there were depth issues, as well as age and injury. As one of the higher rated players on my board at that point, it seemed a good decision.
That doesn't mean you have to be a jerk about it. I did my research and just because I came up with different conclusions from you, doesn't mean those conclusions are necessarily wrong. _________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pollino14 
Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Posts: 15150
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would really like this GB draft. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scar988 
 Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 28719 Location: Charleston, SC
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| spilltray wrote: | | scar988 wrote: | | Quote: | | 16 - Atlanta Falcons - Prescott Burgess - LB - Michigan |
please actually do some research on your picks we have no need for a linebacker at all. |
Well, as I looked through it, it looked like there were depth issues, as well as age and injury. As one of the higher rated players on my board at that point, it seemed a good decision.
That doesn't mean you have to be a jerk about it. I did my research and just because I came up with different conclusions from you, doesn't mean those conclusions are necessarily wrong. |
depth age and injury? our top 6 linebackers are Keith Brooking (30), Ed Hartwell (2 , Michael Boley (24), Ike Reese (33), Jordan Beck (23) and Demorrio Williams (26). just because they aren't all household names doesn't mean that they are bad players. Atlanta is at least 2 deep at all 3 linebacker spots. again we have no need for a damn linebacker, and I guarundamntee that McKay doesn't take one this year (that is unless we somehow trade Demorrio Williams for a high pick). And again, with only 1 guy over 30, age isn't an issue, and with us being 2 deep at the 3 linebacker spots, depth isn't an issue either. If you want positions that we may draft they are: DE, DT, S, TE, OG, OC, RB (2nd day), and possibly WR if there is one that is the absolute BPA at the spot. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stchamp98

Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 52947 Location: Havre, Montana
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Excluding the Kyle Young pick, this is the worst Cards draft I've seen. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 8650 Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stchamp98 wrote: | | Excluding the Kyle Young pick, this is the worst Cards draft I've seen. |
And again, this helps nothing at all. _________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deets 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 12660 Location: Red Sox Nation
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
In the second Miami would take Stanton...but no way he falls that far _________________ "well, they got X player I wanted but they clearly overpaid" is the battle cry of bitter and ignorant football fans
FF Member #67 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|