Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2007 NFL Mock Draft - ** CORRECT Draft Order 10/30/06 **
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2015 NFL Mock Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
aheineken


Joined: 03 Dec 2004
Posts: 2469
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great Rams pick. I have no arguements there.
_________________
My teams:
St. Louis Rams, Cardinals, Blues
Michigan Wolverines
Southern Miss Golden Eagles
Akron Zips
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gang_Green03


Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 3104
Location: New York
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very good Jets pick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trainmap


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 2603
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know about the Eagles pick Smile

They simply don't need any more defensive lineman. Even if Kearse gets released, they still are very rich at that position. I think that they could go with either a linebacker, safety, corner or running back at that position depending on who's available! Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trainmap


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 2603
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, we don't need a tackle. We have a ton of money in that position already and have Glenn and Diem. They are one of the best pairs of tackles in the entire league and we don't need another one. Expect us to draft either a cornerback, safety, linebacker, defensive tackle or an insanely good guard. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
l3lind golfer


Most Valuable Poster (6th Ballot)

Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 34648
Location: California
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damn, the Rams just miss out on both LaMarr Woodley and LaRon Landry.

Pat Willis is a nice pick though.
_________________
Mossburg wrote:
HootersPatrol wrote:
This your first year of watching football?


Clearly. I joined this site in 2005 to talk movies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
drew39k


Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 2938
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:33 pm    Post subject: Re: 2007 NFL Mock Draft - ** CORRECT Draft Order 10/30/06 * Reply with quote

MoMoney717 wrote:
Jayme96 wrote:
SkinsDraftGuru wrote:


12. Steelers (2-5) - Marshawn Lynch RB California
(Willie Parker is no doubt a NFL Running back, but with the loss of Bettis and no depth to speak of behind parker, I see the steelers taking Lynch here.)

23. Vikings (4-2) - Zach Miller TE Arizona St.


Probably the 2nd to worst position you could have the Steelers picking...QB being the worst....meaning making no sense at all based on need. You don't spend the #12 pick on the draft on a BACKUP. Willie is in his 2nd year as a starter, doing good, and is only 25 years old. It doesn't do much good to have 2 star RBs if your O Line sucks. Steelers would take O Line, LB, or WR here (WR being a distant 3rd).

As bad as the Steelers' pick was, your Vikings' pick is just as good lol. Perfect pick for the Vikes there. WR is another strong option for them there...they need better receiving targets, be it WR or TE.


I disagree. Another RB would be good but I think a more punishing back would be better. Wilie does not consistantly gain yards against decent Ds and seems to just break off a few good runs. Not sure if Lynch could be that good inside runner but a RB is not out of the question


woundt brian leonard in the second or third be a better choice for the steelers? then they can use there first rounder on an actuall need
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dex_jackson


Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 483
Location: Moncton, N-B
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bad niners pick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vikings101


Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 3372
Location: AZ
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excellent Vikings pick, we need a guy with good hands.
_________________

Sig by chief_fan822003
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SkinsDraftGuru


Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 43
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Updated Colts pick. I have them taking Aaron Rouse from VT now.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
4pmac


Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 95
Location: cleveland
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:54 pm    Post subject: Re: 2007 NFL Mock Draft - ** CORRECT Draft Order 10/30/06 * Reply with quote

[quote="Jayme96"][quote="SkinsDraftGuru"]

12. Steelers (2-5) - [b]Marshawn Lynch RB California[/b]
(Willie Parker is no doubt a NFL Running back, but with the loss of Bettis and no depth to speak of behind parker, I see the steelers taking Lynch here.)

23. Vikings (4-2) - [b]Zach Miller TE Arizona St.[/b][/quote]

Probably the 2nd to worst position you could have the Steelers picking...QB being the worst....meaning making no sense at all based on need. You don't spend the #12 pick on the draft on a BACKUP. Willie is in his 2nd year as a starter, doing good, and is only 25 years old. It doesn't do much good to have 2 star RBs if your O Line sucks. Steelers would take O Line, LB, or WR here (WR being a distant 3rd).

As bad as the Steelers' pick was, your Vikings' pick is just as good lol. Perfect pick for the Vikes there. WR is another strong option for them there...they need better receiving targets, be it WR or TE.[/quote]



You dont spend a #12 pick on a backup? The Saints spent a #2 pick on a backup. (Who btw has been a bust to this point)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uwleagle


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 216
Location: California
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the Packers pick in Jarrett, but I can't help but think that if Sidney Rice declares that he will be the second wide receiver taken, leaving Ginn to fall to the Pack.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mksadng


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 2198
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

4pmac Reggie Bush has been far from a bust their using him more as a receiving back then a runner so he can use his speed more mayb u should look at more then rushing yards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kazkal


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 3965
PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gaine Adams as a 3-4 OLB makes me cry irl.
_________________
FU 49ers
<3 Kaepernick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
4pmac


Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 95
Location: cleveland
PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="mksadng"]4pmac Reggie Bush has been far from a bust their using him more as a receiving back then a runner so he can use his speed more mayb u should look at more then rushing yards[/quote]

Reggie Bush has a current avg of 6.9 yards per catch, 3.0 rush avg and no td's from scrimmage. Maybe you should do more looking. Btw Gaines Adams is 6-5 270 hes not gonna be an OLB.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MWil23


Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 1900
PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like the mock except for the Browns pick...

Moses isn't considered 3-4 material.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2015 NFL Mock Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group