| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
KManX89
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 485
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
|
 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:09 am Post subject: Predict our Offensive and Defensive rankings for 2013 |
 |
|
|
Pretty self-explanatory. Predict where we'll be ranked in each offensive and defensive category out of all 32 teams next year (sorry, just had to make this thread, and after the drafting of Dat One and Lacy and Franklin, I think we'll improve in both categories).
Offense:
Total Offense (YPG):
Scoring Offense:
Pass Offense:
Run Offense:
Defense:
Total Defense (YPG):
Scoring Defense:
Pass Defense:
Run Defense:
Sacks:
_________________
SPURS 4 NBA TITLE!
Last edited by KManX89 on Tue May 28, 2013 11:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopackgonerd
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 134
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Offense:
Total Offense: 6th
Scoring Offense: 3rd
Pass Offense: 2nd
Run Offense: 14th
Defense:
Total Defense: 9th
Scoring Defense: 8th
Pass Defense: 10th
Run Defense: 8th
Sacks: 5th |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5715
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Hard to say for the offense. Because of the running game, I am not concerned IF we can run the ball but WILL we run it. I love Mac as a coach but he has a noticeable flaw and thatis aabandoning the run when we get down in games. DuJuan Harris was able to run very well behind our mangled and twisted offensive line last year. We will be able to run the ball, but will Mac use it more now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ECPackers
Joined: 24 Oct 2010
Posts: 654
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
offense; 3rd
defense; 17th
_________________
GREEN BAY PACKERS
JARRET BUSH IS MY BOY!
Brewers
Bucks
Badgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HokieHigh
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 1662
Location: Blacksburg
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Offense:
Total Offense (YPG): 3
Scoring Offense: 1
Pass Offense: 1
Run Offense: 14
Defense:
Total Defense (YPG): 2
Scoring Defense: 1
Pass Defense: 14
Run Defense: 4
Sacks:2
Turnovers: 1
Superbowl Champs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ugLymayNe
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 10796
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Offense:
Total Offense (YPG): 7th
Scoring Offense: 4th
Pass Offense: 3rd
Run Offense: 14th
Defense:
Total Defense (YPG): 11
Scoring Defense: 13
Pass Defense: 9
Run Defense: 16
Sacks: 5
_________________
@PJHotel_
| jfinley88 wrote: | | All I drink is capri suns, sunny delight, and womenly alcoholic drinks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CentralFC
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 2209
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Offense:
Total Offense (YPG): 7th
Scoring Offense: 3rd
Pass Offense: 4th
Run Offense: 12th
Defense:
Total Defense (YPG): 10th
Scoring Defense: 12th
Pass Defense: 7th
Run Defense: 12th
Sacks: 5th
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Kuhn
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 369
Location: UWM
|
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:14 pm Post subject: Re: Predict our Offensive and Defensive rankings for 2013 |
|
|
|
Offense:
Total Offense (YPG): 3
Scoring Offense: 1
Pass Offense: 2
Run Offense: 13
Defense:
Total Defense (YPG): 8
Scoring Defense: 4
Pass Defense: 6
Run Defense: 13
Sacks: 2
_________________
| ChaRisMa wrote: | | So get off Ted's cashews people. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCPackFan
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 719
Location: Kinston, NC
|
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Offense:
Total Offense (YPG): 2
Scoring Offense: 3
Pass Offense: 2
Run Offense: 16
Defense:
Total Defense (YPG): 12
Scoring Defense: 13
Pass Defense: 11
Run Defense: 21
Sacks: 9
_________________
| Danish_Pack_Fan wrote: | | We are [inappropriate/removed] at safety |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pmikep
Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Posts: 344
|
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
OFFENSE:
TOTAL OFFENCE (YPG)= 1
SCORING OFFENSE= 1
PASS OFFENSE= 1
RUSHING OFFENSE=10
DEFENSE
TOTAL DEFENSE (YPG)= 7
SCORING DEFENSE=3
PASS DEFENSE=2
RUN DEFENSE= 8
SACKS= 12
SUPER BOWL !!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DavidatMIZZOU
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 6270
Location: The ZOU
|
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think you are all very optimistic about our run offense. I was going to guess 20th or so.
I'd also guess we score a lot of points. That being the case, our run defense and pass defense will probably reflect that.
_________________
GO PACK GO!
I won an award on the Packers forum, most grumpiest or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gizmo2012
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 2354
|
| Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ECPackers wrote: | offense; 3rd
defense; 17th |
So you predict the Packers will be better on offense = check
So you predict the Packers will be worse on defense = no check
Why would you not think the Packers will be better on defense (11th last year I believe) when they have key starters returning from injury and made some improvements through the draft.
Desmond Bishop, Nick Perry, a healthier Tramon Williams, Datone Jones etc. leads me to believe the defense could be considerably better. Add to that the potential for an even more productive and clock consuming offense and I think the defense can improve on last years ranking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCPackFan
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 719
Location: Kinston, NC
|
| Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| gizmo2012 wrote: | | ECPackers wrote: | offense; 3rd
defense; 17th |
So you predict the Packers will be better on offense = check
So you predict the Packers will be worse on defense = no check
Why would you not think the Packers will be better on defense (11th last year I believe) when they have key starters returning from injury and made some improvements through the draft.
Desmond Bishop, Nick Perry, a healthier Davon House, Datone Jones etc. leads me to believe the defense could be considerably better. Add to that the potential for an even more productive and clock consuming offense and I think the defense can improve on last years ranking. |
Fixed...
Anyway, I also believe the defense can improve, maybe not necessarily overall, but barring injuries, our run defense can improve but I'm more interested in what happens with the pass-rush. I think the athleticism of Set Datone will be a key factor along with that of Mike Daniel's and believe it or not, the athleticism of Mike Neal. If Neal is able to drop back into coverage or pass rush from the so-called Elephant OLB position, we might see some interesting packages this season that hopefully will not be hit or miss. I'm still concerned about that secondary, but our front-7 just might be able to mask some of our deficiencies in the defensive backfield.
_________________
| Danish_Pack_Fan wrote: | | We are [inappropriate/removed] at safety |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopackgonerd
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 134
|
| Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCPackFan wrote: | | gizmo2012 wrote: | | ECPackers wrote: | offense; 3rd
defense; 17th |
So you predict the Packers will be better on offense = check
So you predict the Packers will be worse on defense = no check
Why would you not think the Packers will be better on defense (11th last year I believe) when they have key starters returning from injury and made some improvements through the draft.
Desmond Bishop, Nick Perry, a healthier Davon House, Datone Jones etc. leads me to believe the defense could be considerably better. Add to that the potential for an even more productive and clock consuming offense and I think the defense can improve on last years ranking. |
Fixed...
Anyway, I also believe the defense can improve, maybe not necessarily overall, but barring injuries, our run defense can improve but I'm more interested in what happens with the pass-rush. I think the athleticism of Set Datone will be a key factor along with that of Mike Daniel's and believe it or not, the athleticism of Mike Neal. If Neal is able to drop back into coverage or pass rush from the so-called Elephant OLB position, we might see some interesting packages this season that hopefully will not be hit or miss. I'm still concerned about that secondary, but our front-7 just might be able to mask some of our deficiencies in the defensive backfield. |
I'm just concerned with the Saftey position more than anything. We're are arguably 4 deep at Corner. 5 Corners started at one time or another last season. And played pretty well. Bush is another story, but Opposite Burnett is the hugest question mark imo. We've lost Nick Colins and Charles Woodson these past few seasons. Our best playmakers other than Clay Matthews on defense. Those are tough shoes to fill and it showed last season.
I'm not to worried because I like the front 7 like you said. But I want someone to emerge from the Saftey position. I have a feeling Mcmillian will, but that's because I really don't like seeing Jennings back there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KManX89
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 485
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
|
| Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Call me crazy, but I really think we'll surprise a lot of people defensively next year. Contrary to popular belief, our defense wasn't quite as bad as the Divisional game would indicate, we were ranked 11th in the league, which is certainly passable. People just look at that one game and use that as the stepping stone by which to judge our defense by, when in fact, it wasn't necessarily our D as a whole that was the issue last year. We were just fine defensively against the pass, one of the top ranked secondaries in the NFL last year, as a matter of fact according to FootBall Focus, it was stopping the run that did us in last year on the defensive side of the ball, especially the Read-Option, which we addressed by taking Dat One in the 1st, who is ranked as one of, if not the best Read-Option defenders in the whole draft, as you might recall. Plus, we're getting Perry and Bishop back, two important pieces of our defense, and Perry will have another year under his belt to learn the defense, so our defense next year will be better than most people might think. Now, I'm not saying we'll be a top 5 D next year or hell, to even make the top 10 would be quite the blessing for this young defense, but we won't be quite as terrible defensively as a lot of people claim.
Like every other team, though, people are going to regard us as being terrible defensively until we prove otherwise on the field (same thing with our OL, giving up 51 sacks last year, which should also improve with a bunch of guys, even 2 1st rounders, coming back healthy next year), I get that, so I can't wait to hopefully surprise everyone next year with this California Gold Rush (Matthews [USC], Perry [USC], Datone [UCLA]), go Pack!
_________________
SPURS 4 NBA TITLE! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
